By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - I think it's safe to say the PS3 is the definitive graphics king for this gen

Sevengen said:
when do these silly comparison threads stop?
truth is, both consoles are so close graphically that there really is no way to definitively prove which one has the edge, so that leaves personal opinion and bias as the deciding factors, which, in the end prove nothing.

for every screenshot of Uncharted 3 on the PS3, there's a shot of Crysis 2 on the 360, or even Battlefield 3 for that matter which beats both of them hands down for lighting, shading and textures. Now, you can tell me I'm wrong or crazy, but it's my opinion... afforded me because of the rediculously close tech output from the HD twins.

there are no nails. no coffin. just opinion.


LOL! Are you serious about Crysis 2 or BF3 on consoles looking better then Uncharted 3 or God of War 3? Get real man, mutliplat titles on consoels are inferior to PS3 exclusives. Unless you play Crysis 2 and BF3 on Ultra with 8xAA on a PC then there is nothing that comes close to PS3 exclusives.



Around the Network
Jay520 said:
TadpoleJackson said:
Bullshots and trailer screens aren't proof of anything ^


The GoW pic is in-game.

Final Fantasy, not so sure. But that's multiplatform anyway, so I don't know why NintendoPie posted that. Maybe he thinks thunder looks hot?

This. Again.

 

@OP Thread derailed...Witcher 2 on PC looks way better than that...



In graphical terms it's the best, even tough best games are should not defined by graphics. In temrs of graphic design I've seen excellent games on all platforms.



I thought this argument was already decided five years ago and it was just trolls and fanboys that kept the argument going?



 SW-5120-1900-6153

green_sky said:

The Last of US...

HOLY FUCKING SHIT!

And just imagine, this isn't even the main code, far from it actually.

Further stregthening my point that the only competition to the PS3 (in terms of graphics) is real life. and real life still loses! 

N_O_W__B_E_L_E_I_V_E



Around the Network

Both the 360 and PS3 appear to be on about the same playing field as far as graphics are concerned. I don't think I've seen a single game on the PS3 that made me feel like it simply wouldn't be possible on the 360. I'll openly admit that, in my opinion (and that's all this entire thread is--opinion), the two best looking games released this gen are both on the PS3. Those games are God of War 3 and Uncharted 3. They don't blow away my favorites on the 360 but they do look better to me.

Thing is, the PS3 was released a year after the 360. It was supposed to be packing this new, amazing Cell technology that would blow away PC's. It used Blu-Ray as its primary format (which people wrongly stated would pack all of these extra textures, etc.). The system cost anywhere from $200-$300 more than the Xbox 360. With all of these things factored in, the PS3 should have destroyed the 360 in the graphics department. In the end, it's just slightly better looking when it comes to a couple of game series. And even then, it may just be because Sony's studios pushed the console in a way that Microsoft's studios may not have tried.

Long live "the king".



Can't believe I let Gilgamesh suck me into posting in this thread (Twice if you count this post!). In the end, the battle between PS3 and 360 is over. At this point, why are gamers still trying to convince themselves that their console is better?



d21lewis said:
Can't believe I let Gilgamesh suck me into posting in this thread.

Don't let this be a repeat of this thread.



No love for Red Dead?









Jay520 said:
d21lewis said:
Can't believe I let Gilgamesh suck me into posting in this thread.

Don't let this be a repeat of this thread.

I still see a therapist twice a month because of that thread.  He says I'm making great progress.  Then he rapes me.