You do not spend 7k a year in taxes for kids to go to school.
And furthermore, kids SHOULD be in school. They should be learning with OTHER kids, interacting with strangers and other people and adjusting to society. school is where kids learn AND grow socially and societally.

Furthermore, your point is invalid because the stipend doesn't extend to private school. I can claim the 7k if I teach them myself, but not if I send them to private school. It is a crazy world when people think they deserve to be paid for teaching their own kids, which I would call complete and utter neglect.

AND further furthermore, he wants to dismantle public schooling completely. So how is your point even relevant when no taxes would even go to public schools that don't exist?

You do not spend 7k a year in taxes for kids to go to school.
And furthermore, kids SHOULD be in school. They should be learning with OTHER kids, interacting with strangers and other people and adjusting to society. school is where kids learn AND grow socially and societally.

Furthermore, your point is invalid because the stipend doesn't extend to private school. I can claim the 7k if I teach them myself, but not if I send them to private school. It is a crazy world when people think they deserve to be paid for teaching their own kids, which I would call complete and utter neglect.

AND further furthermore, he wants to dismantle public schooling completely. So how is your point even relevant when no taxes would even go to public schools that don't exist?

i never read his points, just what you said. How much does a school spend to teach a child in a year? Is that tax money not intented to help the kids? Should they not have access to that money to get the best education, wether it be public, private or home schooling? Whats wrong with that?

The rest is all your opinion. Maybe you should take a look at some public schools, especially in cities were kids seem to not learn, not graduate, and not be safe at school.

1. A good parent who teaches their children is undoubtedly more effective than the public education system. 

2. Getting rid of centralized control and giving it back to states and local communities =/= aboloshing the public school system 

And that right there is the main qualifier that makes this whole thing fucked up.

Yes, he does want to get rid of public schools. CAn't find the source but it used ot be there on his website.

"*  Help parents better educate their children by providing parents with a $5,000 per child tax credit for tutors, books, computers, and other K-12 related educational needs.

*  Ensure that the federal government treats high school diplomas earned through homeschooling the same as other high school diplomas."

You trust the government to do a better job? As for the bolded, I'm not sure what you're trying to say- are you quoting that as a negative or something?

Yes. Say I work really hard to get into a really tough school. My diploma is worth just as much as someone who got homeschooled to, likely, a public school level.

You're just innocent leather. You think the average person is the paradigm of model citizenry and intelligence.