By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Future Mario Games will have Downloadable Stages

Did this just become a fake Mario game now?



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Why don't they just make a full new game instead? That would give Nintendo's hardware more exposure to the public than downloadable stages that most people don't know about. Selling more hardware means selling more software means more profits for Nintendo.

Because that could harm them in the long term. You have seen here (and in many other places) how people complain "another Mario game". If they launch many Mario games of the same genre, in this case platforming, in the same console that could cause fatigue among the buyers and mean lower sales for future Super Mario games.

By launching only 2 Super Mario games during the console's lifespan but with DLC, they can avoid that danger while increasing their income. After all they won't force you to buy it, it's your option.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

RolStoppable said:
Why don't they just make a full new game instead? That would give Nintendo's hardware more exposure to the public than downloadable stages that most people don't know about. Selling more hardware means selling more software means more profits for Nintendo.


I agree completely.  I hope that Nintendo doesn't start putting out half games and charging for the rest of the content.  I hate it when others do it and would hate it if they did it. 



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

RolStoppable said:
JEMC said:
RolStoppable said:
Why don't they just make a full new game instead? That would give Nintendo's hardware more exposure to the public than downloadable stages that most people don't know about. Selling more hardware means selling more software means more profits for Nintendo.

Because that could harm them in the long term. You have seen here (and in many other places) how people complain "another Mario game". If they launch many Mario games of the same genre, in this case platforming, in the same console that could cause fatigue among the buyers and mean lower sales for future Super Mario games.

By launching only 2 Super Mario games during the console's lifespan but with DLC, they can avoid that danger while increasing their income. After all they won't force you to buy it, it's your option.

Except that something like a 2D platformer fatigue never existed in video game history. Back in the 8- and 16-bit days there were countless 2D platformers (including several Mario platformers per system) and the good ones were all successful. The thing that put an end to 2D platformers was the widespread misbelief in the mid-'90s that from then on everything had to be in 3D. The gaming industry decided that the era of 2D platformers is over, not the market.

So excuse me if I find your argument of a handful of people on the internet complaining about another Mario game laughable at best and downright stupid at worst.

The NES had 3 Super Mario games (two if you exclude that thing they sold as Super Mario Bros. 2) and the SNES also had 2, and the second one with Yoshi as a central character. And that was in the golden age of platforming. Even the Wii, which has 3 Super Mario games, only has one 2D Mario.

And don't dismiss the fact that people get tired of games/franchises if they get overused. We have seen it a lot of times, and if Mario has avoided that fate is simply because Nintendo has been smart enough to separate its games long enough. Adding DLCs is their new way of doing that.

Mind you, I don't like DLCs, but simply because most of them are rubish and expensive. If done well (the Episodes of GTA IV are the best example) they can be not as bad as we think.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

As long as the dlc are additions and not content cut and made into dlc to make more money then I'm completely fine.



Around the Network
badgenome said:
It's simply amazing how Nintendo always comes up with new ideas to change the industry. Wonder how long it will take Sony to steal this one.

?



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Make DLCs for Mario Kart 7 instead, it's Nintendo most crucial online game.



freebs2 said:

They should add a level editor like in LBP, it takes much less time to craft a blocky Mario Level, I'm sure in a few weeks people would be able to create good levels. Also you have a touch screen to make things more smooth.

This, i dont know why in their "infinite" wisdom they didnt think of this for 2d Mario years ago, they did it for Smash Bros



:(. Hopefully they do this in moderation...



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Seriously..

If this means incomplete games from here on out.. I'm not buying a new Nintendo console for quite some time.



Pixel Art can be fun.