So, Batman is a good game. What's your purpose.
I said don't take this seriously yet it looks like you are.
My purpose?Nothing really I just wan't to know how it feels when you hype up a game yet it isn't even good enough to be your best game.
You do realise the VGAs aren't an absolute measure of quality, yes? You do know quality is subjective, yes? You do realise both Gears & Batman were both met to critical acclaim and have been unanimously declared as some of the best games of the year, yes? You do realise one is a shooter & one is an action-advenure game? You do realise there's no way to objectively declare one game as better, yes? So, why the hell would you make that statement?
Wait what?I said how can you hype up a game so much,but it can't even win as your best game.Batman being the 360's best game made me laugh so much because it's a multi plat lol.
"You do realise there's no way to objectively declare one game as better, yes?"BULLSHIT!!!!
How many people use metacritic or sales on here to determine which one of their games is better LOL!Exactly.
Let me put it this way: The VGAs aren't an absolute measure of quality, just because they say Batman is better doesn't mean it's better.
Also, the only people that use sales & miniscule differences in metacritic/reviews as an absolute to determine quality are fanboys. And people who do what fanboys do, are fanboys themselves.
Also, even if Batman was proven to be objectively better, that would mean nothing. Just because a multiplat is better than an exclusive means nothing. The only people that genuinely care are fanboys.