By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - WW3 becoming more likely? Obama Issues kill order on Ron Paul.

 

WW3 likely or not?

yes 176 51.01%
 
no 99 28.70%
 
See Results because i have no opinion 67 19.42%
 
Total:342
NobleTeam360 said:

The Federal Security Service (FSB) is reporting today that the “secret letter” sent to Prime Minister Putin by Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda contains a warning that United States President Barack Obama has issued an executive-level “kill order” against US Congressman Ron Paul over fears this charismatic politician, who many believe could capture the Republican Presidential 2012 nomination, is about to expose to all Americans what can only be described as the largest mass theft in human history.


...

NobleTeam360 said:

...this charismatic politician...

...

NobleTeam360 said:

who many believe could capture the Republican Presidential 2012 nomination



Around the Network

Here's the link to the story:

http://www.eutimes.net/2011/11/obama-issues-ron-paul-kill-order-as-russia-prepares-for-war/



This is the most ridiculous thing I've seen in a long time. You can't issue a kill order without accusing someone of being a domestic threat to commit terrorism, and Paul has no reason to commit terrorism. Members of the Congress routinely meet with foreign leaders and speak to them regularly - if there was any proof of this Obama would be impeached, removed from office and jailed for both terrorism and treason since he tried to interfere illegally with political representation.



People are difficult to govern because they have too much knowledge.

When there are more laws, there are more criminals.

- Lao Tzu

I GIVE THIS ARTICLE A BIG FAIL!!! WHAT A BIG PILE OF SH-T. THE PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL MOVEMENT IS THE WAY TO GO.



leatherhat said:
TeddostheFireKing said:
leatherhat said:
TeddostheFireKing said:
leatherhat said:
Everybody do themselves a favor and support Ron Paul. No need for corporate/lobbyist/Israeli puppets in office anymore.

one of Ron Paul's policy's is to remove abortion, so he would of lost my vote because of that (I'm British, so I have no say in who gets elected in America)


He thinks it should be decided at the state level, actually. Plus you shoulldn't base your opinion on one social issue in these dark times. 


its a social issue very close to my heart, I'm not changing my morals

Why is it close to your heart?

Ron Paul will have us living  in a big smoking pile of  dog sh-t before you could say WTF happened. I agree with some of his ideas but some are pure bull. As far as him winning. Nope, not going to happen. It will be Newt or Mitt. However both have no chance. The only republican I have any respect for is Jon Huntsman.



Around the Network

This is so far fetched that you should have said that the state puff marshmallow man is going to take over the earth with alien technology.



spaceguy said:
leatherhat said:
TeddostheFireKing said:
leatherhat said:
TeddostheFireKing said:
leatherhat said:
Everybody do themselves a favor and support Ron Paul. No need for corporate/lobbyist/Israeli puppets in office anymore.

one of Ron Paul's policy's is to remove abortion, so he would of lost my vote because of that (I'm British, so I have no say in who gets elected in America)


He thinks it should be decided at the state level, actually. Plus you shoulldn't base your opinion on one social issue in these dark times. 


its a social issue very close to my heart, I'm not changing my morals

Why is it close to your heart?

Ron Paul will have us living  in a big smoking pile of  dog sh-t before you could say WTF happened. I agree with some of his ideas but some are pure bull. As far as him winning. Nope, not going to happen. It will be Newt or Mitt. However both have no chance. The only republican I have any respect for is Jon Huntsman.

Thats nice Mr. From the UK



ǝןdɯıs ʇı dǝǝʞ oʇ ǝʞıן ı ʍouʞ noʎ 

Ask me about being an elitist jerk

Time for hype

TheSource said:

This is the most ridiculous thing I've seen in a long time. You can't issue a kill order without accusing someone of being a domestic threat to commit terrorism, and Paul has no reason to commit terrorism. Members of the Congress routinely meet with foreign leaders and speak to them regularly - if there was any proof of this Obama would be impeached, removed from office and jailed for both terrorism and treason since he tried to interfere illegally with political representation.


The story is ludicrous, but the constitution has little restraint on the Executive or the Congress, anymore. Hell, the Supreme Court is in danger of becoming highly politicized, too.

The assassination of a leading political figure would still be too much, but when you look at the unconstitionality of the Patriot Act, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, assassination of Al-Awlaki, NDAA12, etc, things are certainly heading in that direction.



superchunk said:
NobleTeam360 said:
superchunk said:
1) why don't people put sources when they copy/paste? Is it really that hard?
2) While I am not fully against or for Ron Paul yet, I don't think a large majority think he has a shot to get the nomination.
3) The entire rest of the idea seems like it comes from the Onion.


is it that hard to go to the website yourself and look?


When someone creates a new thread with an article... they should paste the link to the article. It really should just be common sense. I shouldn't have to google the article to find it.


like i said before is it that hard to do? Instead of typing back pointless arguments you could of already searched and found the article.



TadpoleJackson said:
NobleTeam360 said:

im interested in hearing your news source's is it FOX MSNBC or better yet CNN? Or maybe you get your info from Wikipedia lol. You either follow mainstream or not i choose the latter. wether its fake or not is legit to ask as once i see no source's i did question it myself but i was more interested from the Russia part of the article not the kill order on Ron Paul.

The article is so far fetched and that site is a joke. If you provided a legitimate source than I may have thought about finding one to counter but until then I will just laugh at you


You still didn't give me what your news source's are.