By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - On behalf of the United States of America F**K Califorina

fordy on 08 November 2011
thismeintiel said:
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:

And last I checked, Fox News is actually one of the most, if not the most watched, news channel.


So the more people watch something, the truer it becomes?

It means it's more trusted, which is the exact opposite of Raider84 was saying.  And just because you don't agree with what they are reporting doesn't make it false.


Also doesn't make it automatically true. It could be argued that many watch it for the entertainment factor.

Besides, it helps when you've heard the evidence presented in the court case, which I stated earlier, as well as not relying on just one news source (if you can call it that...)



Around the Network
thismeintiel on 08 November 2011
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:

And last I checked, Fox News is actually one of the most, if not the most watched, news channel.


So the more people watch something, the truer it becomes?

It means it's more trusted, which is the exact opposite of Raider84 was saying.  And just because you don't agree with what they are reporting doesn't make it false.


Also doesn't make it automatically true. It could be argued that many watch it for the entertainment factor.

Besides, it helps when you've heard the evidence presented in the court case, which I stated earlier, as well as not relying on just one news source (if you can call it that...)

Lol, your bias is astounding.  Anyway, what was so biased or untrue in the article linked in the OP?



 

amp316 on 08 November 2011

I don't understand why this would make you say f--- the entire state of California, but whatever...



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

fordy on 08 November 2011
thismeintiel said:
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:

And last I checked, Fox News is actually one of the most, if not the most watched, news channel.


So the more people watch something, the truer it becomes?

It means it's more trusted, which is the exact opposite of Raider84 was saying.  And just because you don't agree with what they are reporting doesn't make it false.


Also doesn't make it automatically true. It could be argued that many watch it for the entertainment factor.

Besides, it helps when you've heard the evidence presented in the court case, which I stated earlier, as well as not relying on just one news source (if you can call it that...)

Lol, your bias is astounding.  Anyway, what was so biased or untrue in the article linked in the OP?


Does it say anything abut the factors as to why he was found guilty? The evidence the presecution actually produced? Or did the article seem to be stating that the doctor became a scapegoat for MJ fans?

Once again, I got those factors from other sources of news, I don't limit myself to just the one. Can you please tell me how referring to multiple sources of news is bias?



Mr Khan on 08 November 2011
Marks said:
People are so stupid.

When Jackson is alive they call him a child molester, freak, insane, etc. but as soon as he dies he becomes a saint and they want redemption for his death.

Anyone who dies prematurely generally gains a sort of pop-culture sainthood. St. Kennedy and St. Elvis would testify to that



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Around the Network
Marks on 08 November 2011
Mr Khan said:
Marks said:
People are so stupid.

When Jackson is alive they call him a child molester, freak, insane, etc. but as soon as he dies he becomes a saint and they want redemption for his death.

Anyone who dies prematurely generally gains a sort of pop-culture sainthood. St. Kennedy and St. Elvis would testify to that


lol so true!