thismeintiel said:
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:
fordy said:
thismeintiel said:
And last I checked, Fox News is actually one of the most, if not the most watched, news channel.
|
So the more people watch something, the truer it becomes?
|
It means it's more trusted, which is the exact opposite of Raider84 was saying. And just because you don't agree with what they are reporting doesn't make it false.
|
Also doesn't make it automatically true. It could be argued that many watch it for the entertainment factor.
Besides, it helps when you've heard the evidence presented in the court case, which I stated earlier, as well as not relying on just one news source (if you can call it that...)
|
Lol, your bias is astounding. Anyway, what was so biased or untrue in the article linked in the OP?
|
Does it say anything abut the factors as to why he was found guilty? The evidence the presecution actually produced? Or did the article seem to be stating that the doctor became a scapegoat for MJ fans?
Once again, I got those factors from other sources of news, I don't limit myself to just the one. Can you please tell me how referring to multiple sources of news is bias?
