At thte time I thought he was just purposely adding confusion. When he refers to the Kingdom Hearts moment, not only does he attribute stefl with the originating of it, but he calls it a shitstorm.

In reality, he's been having people talk about nonsense, he didn't read the OP, and he thought he was in the Xmen.

While I believe he's town also, at that point in the game (and still now) I don't think he's said anything that could help elucidate anything. (Ofcourse, there may be some vague post that he'll be sure to say was a stab at X who will turn up mafia at the end of the game). Hat is more than capable of drumming up discussion, but let's see something a bit more informed.

Also, what does everyone think about lynching today? We haven't had this discussion in a while.

Except that it was you who took the off-hand mention of it, and ran with it.

Sorry, but you had everything to do with the Kingdom hearts being in this discussion, mentioning that you wonder who is Mickey, referring to yourself  as a (capitalized) King AFTER you had blatantly called yourself cyclops (the reference that you'd rather be wolverine, as those two are never far from each other), but yet not until you came out and said it.

Honestly, I was getting the vibe that you were Mickey, so it was taking me a while to decide whether my mind was blown or not. In the end, I believe you had no idea about the whole thing, so really, what happened was you causing a mess with little purpose.

It's like you to do something like that, and if it helps you, then please keep doing what you're doing, but don't expect me to stand by while you transform the thread into something only you can understand. Your mess helps you, and my suspecting people in a normal manner helps me. The two can coexist, so let's not talk about how I'm stifling discussion when the only discussion is one that you solely understand.

Like, how am I supposed to show you up if you've created an artificial context? At best, I'd have to both figure out what you're looking for and once that's done, the only people I can trust to make a mistake are people I would consider dumber than myself, and that's not a solid figure I can rely on, nor is it a good condition.

This is the reason what I always hated about Hat's playstyle. He always acts as if he plays his own game, and that's the reason I have problems deciphering him. His playstyle could help town because the scum can't get a read on him, but as scum he could manipulate the town to his wishing.

The most interesting thing about this though, is that Hat hasn't been mafia in such a long time, that nobody remembers how he plays as mafia. IIRC he played very safe and was quiet. How that may have changed over the course of the last 8 games or so, I wouldn't be able to tell you, but I'd think he'd appear just as out of place as he did then.

When I go game by game with Hat, he appears out of place every game, as every game he plays slightly differently from the last. Perhaps I need to take a more macro analysis of his play. Rather than doing different things, or doing things differently, maybe I should be concerned about broad changes? Time will tell, but when I take this new viewpoint, his play this game is exactly the same as the few before this one, so I'd say he's at least very consistent, if not town entirely.

Who knows, he might be anti-town survivor, in which case I'll vote him immediately. That would be great.

What, you are FOR lynching the anti-town survivor on day 1?

XD