A203D said:
Shinobi-san said:
I highly doubt either company will completely pull out of the gaming business or even the hardware business, just because of one failed console. These companies have major significance in the gaming industry and this gives increased value to their respective ecosystems...and nowadays it’s all about the ecosystem and the full entertainment package that ecosystem can offer. This happens to include gaming. So I don’t see either gaming company 'whimfully' pulling out of the industry just because of one console failure.
Worst case scenario, one company does extremely badly, although I don’t even think that’s possible at this point with each brand having a large support base. In that case, I think they might restructure things or take a different approach, but outright pulling out? That’s bullshit. It will take a complete industry meltdown for that to happen.
@bonkers555 Sony definitely has the cash to back their gaming division up, so I think you asking the wrong question. It’s whether or not they want to back up their gaming division or not? That’s the more important question I think. And I think the answer to that question is yes. Sony holds the Playstation brand in high regard and gives it great importance...they also back this up. We’ve seen how Sony has beefed up their first party development...to me I see this as reinforcing an army going to war. Sony is definitely not willing to be giving up their presence in gaming.
|
Like i mentioned, i'm very skeptical about the numbers shown. while i think some things look about right. i dont believe the PS1 which sold 100 mil units, and the PS2, 150 mil units didnt make more money than this. the whole reason Nintendo changed its strategy with the Wii is because it couldnt compete on that level.
i think Microsoft might think about pulling out after their next console. the reason they were so successful this gen is because of the terrible PS3 launch. when the PS4 and 720 come around Microsoft will be competing with a console launch like the PS Vita. Japan wont accept Microsoft. and it will not be easy for them in Europe. personally i think they have contributed much to this console generation and their online service is exlemplary. but three companies competing for the same market is too much, i cant see Microsoft having the patience to continue with another console if the next one cant solidify a stronger userbase.
personally what i can see happening is Sony and Microsoft waiting for Nintendo to release the Wii U, and then annoucing their consoles at a similar price point, with more powerful hardware. so in sense they wont let Nintendo do the same thing as the Wii, they will make a better effort in fighting Nintendo rather than each other.
|
Apart from the Sony figures all being 1 year early (see my previous post) they all look about right to me, these tables always change slightly because of various exchange rates.... but the history of all the numbers can be found here: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/ar/Archive.html
Once you know what to look for it's all there.... just find a table that shows the operating income (or loss) for the different business segments of Sony, for most of the life of Playstation, it has pretty much had it's own segment called 'Game' from 1998 to 2009... before 1998 PS was part of the "electronics" segment but because end of year reports give comparisons to previous years we can easily date back the playstation operating income to the 1996 fiscal year.... given that the original playstation didn't sell gangbusters at launch in 1994 (though this was FY 95) the table is very likely missing a decent whack of losses due to the R&D done for the PS (although some of the R&D expenses will oddly enough be in Nintendo's fiscal reports given that the PS started out life as a SNES add-on)
You can also see similar (probably more correct, but also less up to date) tables here on NeoGAF:
http://neogaf.net/forum/showpost.php?p=19625436&postcount=90
and here on VGC... although liquidninja stopped updating it, and recent changes to the website code have seriously screwed up the table formatting so it's difficult to understand if you didn't see it as it was:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=57802%29.
liquidninja's table used to have the company names on, and also the rows of profits/loss for Sony/MS were all aligned to the bottom of the cells so that the dates lined up properly... the left columns are for Sony, then Nintendo, Sega and Microsoft.
----
To quell your scepticism some more, remember that the profits and losses for the consoles overlap each other, which can hide the achievements of a specific console. (the PS1 was still selling in the early 2000s for example, and the profits it made then will have been partially masked by the losses PS2 made early on)... when this topic came up back in 2008/9 I made an estimate based on these figures regarding what kind of profit the PS1, 2, P and 3 had made in their lives... it's only a rough guess but I thought over it's life the PS1 had probably made about $5-5.5 billion, and at the time the PS2 was around $3.5 billion (now I would guess it is petering out around $4.5 billion) I thought the PSP was probably about even back then (ie had made enough profit to negate early losses) and the PS3 had managed to negate most of the profit the PS1 and 2 had made, and was probably about -$8 billion.
I don't even want to have a guess at what the PSP and PS3 might be at now because Sony lumped the Game division in with other products for the financial statements, and the PSP Vita R&D is probably also eating into the profit the PSP and 3 are currently making too.