M.U.G.E.N said:
Mr Khan said:
M.U.G.E.N said: >_> yeah I won't get into the psp debate..it won't end if I do OT: hope this doesn't harm 3ds or nintendo..don't care much for piracy |
The points regarding PSP software sales in the west was effectively laid out, and this stems from the PSP debate we've had in the past (regarding how Sony treats the device). Sony did not make games that were distinctly compelling, compared to just buying those games on the PS2/3 (or on 360 in the case of a lot of western-oriented third party PSP games). Most are just junior partners of their console games, and therefore their sales were bad. The ones that had full effort in them went well
|
last time I showed how stupid some of the remarks you made about the sony and their treatment of psp first party sw. I really don't think many of you have a clue about the quality of those game you guys are addressing.and they didn't make compelling games for it? another ignorant comment added to the list of ignorant comments made by you about the psp.
but like I said, I really don't want to get into this again. it's a useless debate and one that's gonna make me type a lot lol which I really don't want to
|
The proof is in the sales. Many games are good, but not compelling, not system-sellers or killer apps. I have no doubt that many of the first party PSP games were good as games, but did not serve as distinctly compelling titles
I would charge you with a counter-argument, brief though it may be. At least, do you feel piracy is really the reason these games performed as they did, or that they did not generate appropriate levels of hype?