"No these things didnt come from religion" then how were they conveyed from god to humanity?... i was under the assumption that that is what religion is for to convey god's rules or laws... i mean its not as if god himself communicates these laws if that were the case we wouldn't be having this discussion at all

Im not gonna support 7eyes here because I really don't think Jesus was the son of god. I don't think God would ever want to degrade himself to the level of humans or even have a son(ehich doesn't make any senese what soever. Does god have a wife?) But answer this. In terms of the quran how can a man without any education doesn not know how to read/write able to produce the quran? The book has many things in it (universe is expanding, earth revolves around sun, earth is round, only able to see one side of the moon, etc.) that even a very literate man back then would not know. Answer that?

Interesting point. Why doesn't he just tell us? It's been 2000 years since he last checked in, and even the best kept records will have started to fade by then. Clearly, we've gotten very confused over the whole thing, so if he could clear it up, that would be great.

Or is he testing us again? God sounds an awful lot like GLaDOS.

But he doesn't promise us cake nor does he give us portal guns, I say we replace the (Christan/Islamic/Jewish) god with GLaDOS.

Okay, I only read about half this post, (the first half and the last couple paragraphs), but I want you to do one thing for me: Explain to me how questioning someone's beliefs is in any way offensive.  you keep assuming this thread is offensive, and that I'm stereotyping but All I've done time and time again is ask people to offer supporting evidence to their claims.  There's a lot of "God is this" and "Heaven is Real" and "These are the divine rules" claims being thrown around, all I'm asking is one thing: Prove it.  

If people are going to keep making bold claims, they're going to continuously tell people "this is the truth", I expect them to back it up with conclusive or at least supporting evidence.  Only one person in this entire thread has even attempted that (well, maybe two or three, but only one did so respectfully and in a manner befitting of the respect I offer him).   

Instead you're just proving one of my greatest criticisms of religion:  they can dish out the criticisms and "we want proof" attitude when dealing with science, but when that same burden of proof is turned to them, they are not only unable to deliver, but also hide under their veil of "Don't mock my faith" and we're left with yet another situation where you can't be honest with religion because it's considered taboo to question faith.  

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=133453

So, how exactly does believing there is a God control anyone?  Your reasoning is suspect, and your approach won't produce anything.  What happens when you go and try to prove that there is a God, is you hit the limits of human reasoning when trying to deal with issues like determinism vs free will.  Also, if you want there to be physical evidence, then how would any physical evidence prove anything, outside of there is some entity who can possibly defy the laws of physics.  And if such an entity does it, is the entity supposed to then be on call every time someone wants to set up an experiment, to provide the repeatability that the scientific method calls for?  Or, would it be ok to do it just one time, and then have future generations trust that the entity exists?

If you want proof that God exists, then come up with some sort of experiment you would like to see that would meet your measure of what it takes to believe, and then analyse such to show it is a valid experiment.  If you want just experiences, then I suggest going into the realm of paranormal and you will find a number of testimonials that would show there is weirdness out there.