mantlepiecek said:
Michael-5 said:
Maybe PS3 is just lacking good FPS's, and maybe 360 is lacking good Action Adventure games? I'm sure if Halo was a PS3 exclusive it would still outsell Killzone and Resistance combined x 2. I bet InFamous would match sales on 360 too.
It's not so much of what people buy, it's what developers make. MP games generally sell better on 360 then PS3, regardless of genre. If Sony made more quality FPS's, up to the quality of Halo and Gears, they would sell more. Simple as that.
|
That's not true. Killzone 2 is a very good fps and its rated 91 at metacritic as well, that's as much as halo reach. Yet it sold around 2 million.
Infamous won't match the sales on the 360, I am sure of it. Crackdown 1 is just like infamous and it sold less. Even when it had the halo 3 beta included in it. Crackdown 2 was bad according to many people, so lets not consider it.
There's prototype, that game has sold similarly on both consoles even when it released alongside infamous.
Halo would probably sell more than Killzone if it was on the PS3 because of brand recognition. That doesn't make the PS3 fans fps centric, and it will probably sell only around 4 million-5 million still very poor for a halo game.
|
Yea, but Halo 3 has a higher metascore doesn't it? And Killzone 3's metascore is 86/100 Resistance is also in the 80's is it not? Halo 3, Reach and both Gears have 91-05 metascores I believe.
However rating isn't everything, it's also public appeal, and how polished the game is. Halo is an easy game for any FPS fan to pick up and play. Killzone isn't as online or co-op friendly as Halo is, not even close. Also Halo and Gears are more online focused then Resistance and Killzone, that afftects sales too.
I doubt Halo or Gears would sell that poor on PS3.
Crackdown is nowehere nearly as good as InFamous, and it sold almost as well. I'm sure InFamous would match sales on 360, maybe even sell better. It's not that different from Assassin's Creed and that game does very well on 360.