I prefer not but if motion control is staying then have it as an option. There were so many Wii games i'd love to play but the motion controls turned me off.

No, absolutely not. It adds too much to controller costs and too little to fun.

Back in 2006, I was excited for the Wii.  But motion has since left me underwhelmed, and made PS3 controllers more expensive (for a little-used feature).  I have come to the conclusion that, even if not designed as a gimmick, motion controls can never feel right for gaming.  There's zero feedback, a lack of any real precision unless you have insanely steady hands, and more limited uses than your standard controller.  I'm already sick and tired of motion, get rid of it.

MS may not focus on power, but they will still make a powerful console. Sony will not be launching at the same time and blowing them away.  In fact, Sony have already said they're not making another PS3. Neither are going to take massive losses next gen.

Also, Wii doesn't count. Nintendo basically re-used GC technology with that one. It wasn't made to compete in power.

Only if developers can make something good with it. If it's going to be there just for the sake of being there... then it's best if it wasn't there at all, just for cost reasons.

Yes, even though I don't really use it, I'm sure developers will utilize it in some great ways in the future.
I much prefer a standard controller though.

can't find my original post but i would like to see motion controls done better.
while move is a great option i still fill somethings missing.

Exactly, what if Nintendo and Microsoft made a system that didn't compete in power LOL.

Anyway, I agree with you its probably not going to happen but I don't think Sony would fail if it tried.