By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wii Has The Best Exclusives

o_O.Q on 06 July 2011
RolStoppable said:
o_O.Q said:

huh? worked up? went out of my way? so anyone who creates a thread on a topic goes out of their way? lmfao i came across the article and decided it might make for an interesting discussion i had no idea that some people were so sensitive that they would take my opinion on it and start lashing out at it... but regardless i'm quite sorry that my opinion on the article has upset you so much, next time i make a thread be sure to drop by and give me your ideas on how i may improve so i can get my threads up to the standards you expect

"if you post between five to ten times (or more) a day over a period of a couple of weeks" lol from your reaction i'm thinking that someone could simply say that nintendo games aren't the best games ever created and you'd take that as bias against nintendo 

I've never heard of iNintendo before and the majority of VGC members is probably in the same boat. Posting one of their articles isn't unlike posting an opinion piece from some random N4G blog. How did you find this article anyway?

Yes, I would take such a statement as an indication for a bias against Nintendo, but that in and of itself isn't enough for a confirmation. Besides, a bias against Nintendo alone doesn't tell which side the poster in question is on. Could be Sony, Microsoft or even Sega. As I've said, you have a long enough posting history to be pinned down as a PlayStation fan.


"I've never heard of iNintendo before and the majority of VGC members is probably in the same boat." lmfao i haven't either before the article but i don't get why thats relevant... i don't just read info from select sites on the net i read any info thats available that interests me... as i mentioned before you can drop me some hints to making my future threads up to your standards and i suppose one of those is to restrict myself to only discussing info posted on certain websites

"a bias against Nintendo alone doesn't tell which side the poster in question is on" dude you take this stuff way too seriously... sides? really? lmfao i like gaming in general whether the games in question be on microsoft or nintendo or sony or sega or atari consoles...



Around the Network
o_O.Q on 06 July 2011
RolStoppable said:
o_O.Q said:

"I've never heard of iNintendo before and the majority of VGC members is probably in the same boat." lmfao i haven't either before the article but i don't get why thats relevant... i don't just read info from select sites on the net i read any info thats available that interests me... as i mentioned before you can drop me some hints to making my future threads up to your standards and i suppose one of those is to restrict myself to only discussing info posted on certain websites

"a bias against Nintendo alone doesn't tell which side the poster in question is on" dude you take this stuff way too seriously... sides? really? lmfao i like gaming in general whether the games in question be on microsoft or nintendo or sony or sega or atari consoles...

A good start would be to base threads on sources that are actually worth a damn. For example, if Jack Tretton says that no selfrespecting gamer would play a Nintendo handheld, then this has more merit for discussion than some random person making the exact same statement. A website like iNintendo falls into the realms of irrelevance.

Of course you do like gaming in general and don't take sides. Good luck on trying to keep that image you are projecting on yourself intact.

"sources that are actually worth a damn" lol you sound like me college professor should my sources be peer reviewed also? maybe i should also use citations when i casually browse the net

"if Jack Tretton says that no selfrespecting gamer would play a Nintendo handheld, then this has more merit for discussion than some random person" so therefore we should only discuss info that has been released directly from the gaming companies ( thats how i interpreted that i may be wrong )... if thats the case then the majority of the threads on this site should be shut down lol

"Good luck on trying to keep that image you are projecting" good luck staying secluded to one gaming company and disregarding what the others have to offer



Player1x3 on 07 July 2011
RolStoppable said:
Player1x3 said:
RolStoppable said:

You called the article "garbage" in your original post which pretty much implies complete disagreement with what was said. You've been long around here to establish a clear PlayStation bias, so that's that.

So disagreeing with this pretty dumb written and bad article makes you PlayStation biased?

No, posting history does.


Ok, you are calling him out on PlayStation bias when you're obviously not Nintendo biased...



SnesTea on 07 July 2011
oniyide said:
Snesboy said:
oniyide said:
Snesboy said:
oniyide said:
Snesboy said:
Boutros said:
That's a rather very uneducated article. I'll leave it at that.

Btw No More Heroes is on the PS360.

Nope. Not in North America.

the game is being released on PS3 next month with Move functions, no longer exclusive

Resident Evil 4 is a GameCube exclusive.

well that made no sense, just admit u were wrong n keep it moving

Don't care. I'm not wrong. And people aren't going to buy No More Heroes on PS3 anyway.

how r u not wrong??? the game will be avaible in the US making it no longer a Wii exclusive. n i for one wiil get it as i didnt buy it 4 Wii

1.) I'm not wrong because my copy of "Resident Evil 4" has "Only for Nintendo GameCube" written across the top of it.

2.) Because the game kind of tanked, 4 years ago when it came out. Now it's coming out on a new system with pretty new graphics and some other pretty awesome extras. People aren't going to buy a four year old game priced at 50 USD, people are going to get that shiny new copy of Uncharted 3.



Hynad on 07 July 2011
Snesboy said:
oniyide said:
Snesboy said:
oniyide said:
Snesboy said:
oniyide said:
Snesboy said:
Boutros said:
That's a rather very uneducated article. I'll leave it at that.

Btw No More Heroes is on the PS360.

Nope. Not in North America.

the game is being released on PS3 next month with Move functions, no longer exclusive

Resident Evil 4 is a GameCube exclusive.

well that made no sense, just admit u were wrong n keep it moving

Don't care. I'm not wrong. And people aren't going to buy No More Heroes on PS3 anyway.

how r u not wrong??? the game will be avaible in the US making it no longer a Wii exclusive. n i for one wiil get it as i didnt buy it 4 Wii

1.) I'm not wrong because my copy of "Resident Evil 4" has "Only for Nintendo GameCube" written across the top of it.

2.) Because the game kind of tanked, 4 years ago when it came out. Now it's coming out on a new system with pretty new graphics and some other pretty awesome extras. People aren't going to buy a four year old game priced at 50 USD, people are going to get that shiny new copy of Uncharted 3.


The game was available on the PS2 anyways.  :P



Around the Network
Player1x3 on 07 July 2011

Wow, Ive lost a lot of respect for some of the nintendo fans after I've read this thread



Player1x3 on 07 July 2011
RolStoppable said:
Player1x3 said:

Ok, you are calling him out on PlayStation bias when you're obviously not Nintendo biased...

What does my bias matter? You make it sound like I don't have the right to say someone else is biased when he clearly is.


You are (extremly) biased as well. So calling him biased would be pointless



Hynad on 07 July 2011
Player1x3 said:
RolStoppable said:
Player1x3 said:

Ok, you are calling him out on PlayStation bias when you're obviously not Nintendo biased...

What does my bias matter? You make it sound like I don't have the right to say someone else is biased when he clearly is.


You are (extremly) biased as well. So calling him biased would be pointless


And hypocritical.



radiantshadow92 on 07 July 2011
RolStoppable said:
Hynad said:
Player1x3 said:

You are (extremly) biased as well. So calling him biased would be pointless

And hypocritical.

Where's the hypocrisy in my posts? Let me draw an analogy:

There are two thieves. Thief A calls Thief B a thief, because it's quite obvious that Thief B is a thief. Thief B then says that he is not a thief and then calls Thief A a thief. Thief A responds by saying "yes, I am a thief, but so are you". Who of the two is acting hypocritical?

what is this...i dont even....



TruckOSaurus on 07 July 2011
radiantshadow92 said:
RolStoppable said:
Hynad said:
Player1x3 said:

You are (extremly) biased as well. So calling him biased would be pointless

And hypocritical.

Where's the hypocrisy in my posts? Let me draw an analogy:

There are two thieves. Thief A calls Thief B a thief, because it's quite obvious that Thief B is a thief. Thief B then says that he is not a thief and then calls Thief A a thief. Thief A responds by saying "yes, I am a thief, but so are you". Who of the two is acting hypocritical?

what is this...i dont even....

It's not that hard to understand...concentrate.



Signature goes here!