KruzeS on 30 December 2007
highwaystar101 said: 9.4, that's bloody good. |
Unfortunately, the one thing this isn't is bloody. I was hoping that would have been factored into the review.
Reality has a Nintendo bias.
KruzeS on 30 December 2007
Game_boy said:
Since their decision is because it's a case of possible outright banning, I think it can't be held against them. |
Oh, come on. Why is every game the next Manhunt now? This game is nothing like Manhunt.
Besides, I don't live in the UK or Germany, why should I have to put up with the silliness of your BBFCs and USKs? USK ratings were never a problem until now. Publishers would either change the game for Germany, or not release it there at all. Gamers could then buy it online from Austria instead, if they so chose.
The publisher decided to go the easy way with this one, where others didn't. That can, and should be held against them, IMO.
Reality has a Nintendo bias.
KruzeS on 30 December 2007
Nairu said: Have you seen a video of the American version? its quite unexpected. |
Have you seen a video of "uncut" Manhunt 2 violence? You probably haven't, because it caused problems and had to be edited all over the world. Manhunt was AOed in the States - this won't be. They won't cut it in America cause they know it would kill sales there. Well, honestly, it should kill sales here too.
But yes, I have seen videos of that. And I don't consider it any more violent than Kill Bill, which got a 16+ rating across most of Europe. Both have deliciously stylized, over the top violence. Removing that is killing the artistic beauty of the game.
To me it all boils down to this: there were only two games ever that got banned by the BBFC, Carmageddon, which was later overturned, and Manhunt 2. Are you seriously going to tell me you're of the opinion that this is the 3rd more violent game in the history of video gaming? Come on.
Reality has a Nintendo bias.