By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - 9/11 was a conspiracy not a conspiracy theory

 

Do you believe the USA government was involved in 9/11?

Yes 181 40.58%
 
No 201 45.07%
 
Maybe 61 13.68%
 
Total:443
Porcupine_I said:
I don't know why conspiracy theories always have to be so complicated!

if the government was involved in ANY way, i would picture it like this:

"Mister President we have information about a planned Terrorist attack on the United States"

"Terrorist attack? Bombs huh? Well, i was looking for a excuse to wage war anyway, we stand down and let them do their thing and see what happens"

*WTC goes down*

WTF i didn't expect THAT!



haha,brilliant porcupine thats about as close to the truth as we'd get,as with everything its probably a bit of both watching the twin towers episode unfold live on telly is one the most amazing thing i've ever seen an incredible plan from some majorly pissed off nutters,the only thing i don't quite understand is how the planes were not shot down,you'd think the usa air foce would be on top of that

                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond

   

Around the Network
hudsoniscool said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlMXkWW_LM
If you dont believe that there was an explosion watch this video. At 6 minutes and 50 seconds it switches to a video that is by TWC. Just seconds before you hear the planes hit there is a clear thump from an underground explosion

Also jet fuel's maximum burning temperature is 1800 degrees F while steel melts at 2500 degrees, so how did building 7 a steel building collapse (like demolition charges) from a fire when its impossible for it to reach sufficient temperatures to melt steel. Explosives such as c4 can reach 3000 degrees. Fire engineering magazine had said before 9/11 that "no steel building has ever been destroyed by fire."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDCSR3HfhVk&feature=related
This video will show you everything you need to. Watch this then tell me 9/11 wasnt a conspiracy.

this video shows george bush clearly lie about seeing the planes hit the tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60&feature=related

The second video drives some good points. I personally believe in the illuminati so I believe that 9/11 was caused by own goverment. Still, you can't expect most people to believe it or at least hear you out before laughing in your face, it's a very edgy topic.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

In my first post i replied to how shoddy the op's evidence was just with common sense... I ended the post saying it may have been an internal job

After reading the bebunking 9/11 website im going to say the "evidence" that the opposition provides is completely whack...

When someone said "pull" is a demolition term I automatically thought... "or it means to pull back to safety" and thats exactly what silverstien said he meant.

When the other side said "no high rise has been collapsed by fires alone" I thought "Has any high rise had a kamakazee fly into them?"

And when someone said "it took 7 seconds for the building to collapse" I thought... "thats weird.... i never knew you could be inside a building which collapsed and survive... because thats the only way he would be able to tell how the internal structure was holding up before the building collapsed. Most likely the building was falling apart internally before it collapsed completely"



Areym said:
hudsoniscool said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlMXkWW_LM
If you dont believe that there was an explosion watch this video. At 6 minutes and 50 seconds it switches to a video that is by TWC. Just seconds before you hear the planes hit there is a clear thump from an underground explosion

Also jet fuel's maximum burning temperature is 1800 degrees F while steel melts at 2500 degrees, so how did building 7 a steel building collapse (like demolition charges) from a fire when its impossible for it to reach sufficient temperatures to melt steel. Explosives such as c4 can reach 3000 degrees. Fire engineering magazine had said before 9/11 that "no steel building has ever been destroyed by fire."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDCSR3HfhVk&feature=related
This video will show you everything you need to. Watch this then tell me 9/11 wasnt a conspiracy.

this video shows george bush clearly lie about seeing the planes hit the tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60&feature=related

The second video drives some good points. I personally believe in the illuminati so I believe that 9/11 was caused by own goverment. Still, you can't expect most people to believe it or at least hear you out before laughing in your face, it's a very edgy topic.

That video is atually whack... Piss poor evidence. Also, how does bush lying prove anything? lol...



Kasz

I know right?  You could just as eaisly of had "terroirsts" break into the WTC with bombs.  Same effect, and you'd need like thousands and thousands less people to pull it off.


A conspiracy that big would have a lot more proof out there then some crackpot theories supported by debunked science.  Cause you couldn't keep that many people queit.  I mean think of all the people they'd need just to run simulations to make sure there plan would work.... and all the timing and effort of trial runs... etc.


It'd be nigh impossible to tie some random bombers to the government, but some crackpot scheme involving planes and bombs and thermite to set things up... that would have to be about the stupidest way to do it.

Or maybe they made it so "complex" so that anyone that had questions could be then made as a fool, idiot, etc...  It isn't like a thousand people were directly involved.   They could have been involved and not even known it.   I already gave instances like the Manhattan Project and tank development during WW1 where numerous people were involved that didn't have the slightest clue what they were actually helping make. 

Anyways, I would probably sit back and be able to take "what really happened" as the decent truth if it wasn't the fact of so many things.  How the hell does the WTC collapse within 1 hour and the other 2 hours.  The fires didn't even look 1/100 as bad as other skyscraper fires which didn't collapse.  You even have radio communication from firefighters at the floors of impact saying the fires were sporadic and should be contained/put out soon (right before the collapse).  Most of the jet fuel burned outside the buildings at impact.  So how does a fire that is barely burning weaken the steel for a building designed to take impacts from jetliner/possibly multiple impacts.  You would think that even if it did fail that it would take 10-20 hours at least not 1-2..... 



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
Yakuzaice said:

I know I said I didn't want to argue this, but I just need to clear up another thing.  Thermite is not an explosive.  If people were hearing explosions it wasn't thermite.  Also I'd like to see what kind of enclosure this thermite was in that could survive planes hitting at 800-1000 km/h as well as fires for an hour or more, and not have the thermite react immediately.


Let alone the ammount of thermite you would need to cut the steal beams.  Thermite isn't that potent.

People hearing explosions were.... probably hearing explosions.  I mean, the building was collapsing, that's probably a pretty volatlie enviroment that would make things explode.  Like various electric transformers... or just lots of shit hitting the ground.  Basically anything hitting something hard enough sounds like an explosion.


Infact....

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm


Hey, and it's not cherrypicking... it's instead pointing out the cherry picking of Metallicubes side that he's blinded too because he was convinced before he weighed in any logic.

The people who said they heard explosions... explained in context, and not out of context for a shitty internet documentry.

Its hilarious how the theorist can only say word for word what the videos suggest... yet the naysayers are the brainwashed ones... They keep asking the same questions that have been answered... Its hilarious how they convienently ignore facts... just like sethnintendo just did



Max King of the Wild said:
Kasz216 said:
Yakuzaice said:

I know I said I didn't want to argue this, but I just need to clear up another thing.  Thermite is not an explosive.  If people were hearing explosions it wasn't thermite.  Also I'd like to see what kind of enclosure this thermite was in that could survive planes hitting at 800-1000 km/h as well as fires for an hour or more, and not have the thermite react immediately.


Let alone the ammount of thermite you would need to cut the steal beams.  Thermite isn't that potent.

People hearing explosions were.... probably hearing explosions.  I mean, the building was collapsing, that's probably a pretty volatlie enviroment that would make things explode.  Like various electric transformers... or just lots of shit hitting the ground.  Basically anything hitting something hard enough sounds like an explosion.


Infact....

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm


Hey, and it's not cherrypicking... it's instead pointing out the cherry picking of Metallicubes side that he's blinded too because he was convinced before he weighed in any logic.

The people who said they heard explosions... explained in context, and not out of context for a shitty internet documentry.

Its hilarious how the theorist can only say word for word what the videos suggest... yet the naysayers are the brainwashed ones... They keep asking the same questions that have been answered... Its hilarious how they convienently ignore facts... just like sethnintendo just did

So I was debunked by the Pentagon because they released a video showing????  You can't even make out what the hell the object is.  It surely doesn't look like a plane in their video.  How come they couldn't release another footage from the numerous cameras they had at the location.  Why couldn't they release footage that actually showed a plane hit the Pentagon?  Why did the FBI confiscate the tapes of a gas station that had a camera pointed at the exact impact location?

The problem is most of the answers either have serious flaws in them or they exclude things to make their point.  Just like the independent "research" of the Pentagon crash.  Basically they said the plane turned into a huge fireball.  If you look at their little mock up video they don't even take the engines into consideration.  You just see a plane wing disintegrate when it hits the building.  I am sure the plane engines (which couldn't fit the hole) just burnt up right on impact.



sethnintendo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Kasz216 said:
Yakuzaice said:

I know I said I didn't want to argue this, but I just need to clear up another thing.  Thermite is not an explosive.  If people were hearing explosions it wasn't thermite.  Also I'd like to see what kind of enclosure this thermite was in that could survive planes hitting at 800-1000 km/h as well as fires for an hour or more, and not have the thermite react immediately.


Let alone the ammount of thermite you would need to cut the steal beams.  Thermite isn't that potent.

People hearing explosions were.... probably hearing explosions.  I mean, the building was collapsing, that's probably a pretty volatlie enviroment that would make things explode.  Like various electric transformers... or just lots of shit hitting the ground.  Basically anything hitting something hard enough sounds like an explosion.


Infact....

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm


Hey, and it's not cherrypicking... it's instead pointing out the cherry picking of Metallicubes side that he's blinded too because he was convinced before he weighed in any logic.

The people who said they heard explosions... explained in context, and not out of context for a shitty internet documentry.

Its hilarious how the theorist can only say word for word what the videos suggest... yet the naysayers are the brainwashed ones... They keep asking the same questions that have been answered... Its hilarious how they convienently ignore facts... just like sethnintendo just did

So I was debunked by the Pentagon because they released a video showing????  You can't even make out what the hell the object is.  It surely doesn't look like a plane in their video.  How come they couldn't release another footage from the numerous cameras they had at the location.  Why couldn't they release footage that actually showed a plane hit the Pentagon?  Why did the FBI confiscate the tapes of a gas station that had a camera pointed at the exact impact location?


Youre right, an object that is made out of what you drink coke out of and hit dead on into a building with walls made out reinforced concrete doesnt look like a plane... in fact, i'm sure nothing would look like itself after that type of impact... let me hurl you into a building at 500mph and see if you look like a human being still...



Max King of the Wild said:
sethnintendo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Kasz216 said:
Yakuzaice said:

I know I said I didn't want to argue this, but I just need to clear up another thing.  Thermite is not an explosive.  If people were hearing explosions it wasn't thermite.  Also I'd like to see what kind of enclosure this thermite was in that could survive planes hitting at 800-1000 km/h as well as fires for an hour or more, and not have the thermite react immediately.


Let alone the ammount of thermite you would need to cut the steal beams.  Thermite isn't that potent.

People hearing explosions were.... probably hearing explosions.  I mean, the building was collapsing, that's probably a pretty volatlie enviroment that would make things explode.  Like various electric transformers... or just lots of shit hitting the ground.  Basically anything hitting something hard enough sounds like an explosion.


Infact....

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm


Hey, and it's not cherrypicking... it's instead pointing out the cherry picking of Metallicubes side that he's blinded too because he was convinced before he weighed in any logic.

The people who said they heard explosions... explained in context, and not out of context for a shitty internet documentry.

Its hilarious how the theorist can only say word for word what the videos suggest... yet the naysayers are the brainwashed ones... They keep asking the same questions that have been answered... Its hilarious how they convienently ignore facts... just like sethnintendo just did

So I was debunked by the Pentagon because they released a video showing????  You can't even make out what the hell the object is.  It surely doesn't look like a plane in their video.  How come they couldn't release another footage from the numerous cameras they had at the location.  Why couldn't they release footage that actually showed a plane hit the Pentagon?  Why did the FBI confiscate the tapes of a gas station that had a camera pointed at the exact impact location?


Youre right, an object that is made out of what you drink coke out of and hit dead on into a building with walls made out reinforced concrete doesnt look like a plane... in fact, i'm sure nothing would look like itself after that type of impact... let me hurl you into a building at 500mph and see if you look like a human being still...

 

Strong, lightweight, corrosion-resistant, thermally stable components are essential to the viability of any aircraft design, and certain materials have been developed to provide these and other desirable traits. Titanium, first created in sufficiently pure form for commercial use during the 1950s, is utilized in the most critical engine components. While it is very difficult to shape, its extreme hardness renders it strong when subjected to intense heat. To improve its malleability titanium is often alloyed with other metals such as nickel and aluminum. All three metals are prized by the aerospace industry because of their relatively high strength/weight ratio.

The intake fan at the front of the engine must be extremely strong so that it doesn't fracture when large birds and other debris are sucked into its blades; it is thus made of a titanium alloy. The intermediate compressor is made from aluminum, while the high pressure section nearer the intense heat of the combustor is made of nickel and titanium alloys better able to withstand extreme temperatures. The combustion chamber is also made of nickel and titanium alloys, and the turbine blades, which must endure the most intense heat of the engine, consist of nickel-titanium-aluminum alloys. Often, both the combustion chamber and the turbine receive special ceramic coatings that better enable them to resist heat. The inner duct of the exhaust system is crafted from titanium, while the outer exhaust duct is made from composites—synthetic fibers held together with resins. Although fiberglass was used for years, it is now being supplanted by Kevlar, which is even lighter and stronger. The thrust reverser consists of titanium alloy.

Sounds like a coke can to me....   I must start collecting coke cans so I can harvest titanium.


sethnintendo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
sethnintendo said:
Max King of the Wild said:
Kasz216 said:
Yakuzaice said:

I know I said I didn't want to argue this, but I just need to clear up another thing.  Thermite is not an explosive.  If people were hearing explosions it wasn't thermite.  Also I'd like to see what kind of enclosure this thermite was in that could survive planes hitting at 800-1000 km/h as well as fires for an hour or more, and not have the thermite react immediately.


Let alone the ammount of thermite you would need to cut the steal beams.  Thermite isn't that potent.

People hearing explosions were.... probably hearing explosions.  I mean, the building was collapsing, that's probably a pretty volatlie enviroment that would make things explode.  Like various electric transformers... or just lots of shit hitting the ground.  Basically anything hitting something hard enough sounds like an explosion.


Infact....

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm


Hey, and it's not cherrypicking... it's instead pointing out the cherry picking of Metallicubes side that he's blinded too because he was convinced before he weighed in any logic.

The people who said they heard explosions... explained in context, and not out of context for a shitty internet documentry.

Its hilarious how the theorist can only say word for word what the videos suggest... yet the naysayers are the brainwashed ones... They keep asking the same questions that have been answered... Its hilarious how they convienently ignore facts... just like sethnintendo just did

So I was debunked by the Pentagon because they released a video showing????  You can't even make out what the hell the object is.  It surely doesn't look like a plane in their video.  How come they couldn't release another footage from the numerous cameras they had at the location.  Why couldn't they release footage that actually showed a plane hit the Pentagon?  Why did the FBI confiscate the tapes of a gas station that had a camera pointed at the exact impact location?


Youre right, an object that is made out of what you drink coke out of and hit dead on into a building with walls made out reinforced concrete doesnt look like a plane... in fact, i'm sure nothing would look like itself after that type of impact... let me hurl you into a building at 500mph and see if you look like a human being still...

 

Strong, lightweight, corrosion-resistant, thermally stable components are essential to the viability of any aircraft design, and certain materials have been developed to provide these and other desirable traits. Titanium, first created in sufficiently pure form for commercial use during the 1950s, is utilized in the most critical engine components. While it is very difficult to shape, its extreme hardness renders it strong when subjected to intense heat. To improve its malleability titanium is often alloyed with other metals such as nickel and aluminum. All three metals are prized by the aerospace industry because of their relatively high strength/weight ratio.

The intake fan at the front of the engine must be extremely strong so that it doesn't fracture when large birds and other debris are sucked into its blades; it is thus made of a titanium alloy. The intermediate compressor is made from aluminum, while the high pressure section nearer the intense heat of the combustor is made of nickel and titanium alloys better able to withstand extreme temperatures. The combustion chamber is also made of nickel and titanium alloys, and the turbine blades, which must endure the most intense heat of the engine, consist of nickel-titanium-aluminum alloys. Often, both the combustion chamber and the turbine receive special ceramic coatings that better enable them to resist heat. The inner duct of the exhaust system is crafted from titanium, while the outer exhaust duct is made from composites—synthetic fibers held together with resins. Although fiberglass was used for years, it is now being supplanted by Kevlar, which is even lighter and stronger. The thrust reverser consists of titanium alloy.

Sounds like a coke can to me....   I must start collecting coke cans so I can harvest titanium.


Lol, you were complaining that it looked like a cruise missle...  and how the fuck are we suppose to see under the rubble to find the engines? Also, fuck yeah the FBI took footage and wont release it to their most secreative building in the country... it's obvious you have no common sense if you are hell bent on ignore facts and keep asking the same questions thats been answered.