By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sethnintendo on 19 June 2011
Edit Thread
Max King of the Wild said:
Kasz216 said:
Yakuzaice said:

I know I said I didn't want to argue this, but I just need to clear up another thing.  Thermite is not an explosive.  If people were hearing explosions it wasn't thermite.  Also I'd like to see what kind of enclosure this thermite was in that could survive planes hitting at 800-1000 km/h as well as fires for an hour or more, and not have the thermite react immediately.


Let alone the ammount of thermite you would need to cut the steal beams.  Thermite isn't that potent.

People hearing explosions were.... probably hearing explosions.  I mean, the building was collapsing, that's probably a pretty volatlie enviroment that would make things explode.  Like various electric transformers... or just lots of shit hitting the ground.  Basically anything hitting something hard enough sounds like an explosion.


Infact....

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm


Hey, and it's not cherrypicking... it's instead pointing out the cherry picking of Metallicubes side that he's blinded too because he was convinced before he weighed in any logic.

The people who said they heard explosions... explained in context, and not out of context for a shitty internet documentry.

Its hilarious how the theorist can only say word for word what the videos suggest... yet the naysayers are the brainwashed ones... They keep asking the same questions that have been answered... Its hilarious how they convienently ignore facts... just like sethnintendo just did

So I was debunked by the Pentagon because they released a video showing????  You can't even make out what the hell the object is.  It surely doesn't look like a plane in their video.  How come they couldn't release another footage from the numerous cameras they had at the location.  Why couldn't they release footage that actually showed a plane hit the Pentagon?  Why did the FBI confiscate the tapes of a gas station that had a camera pointed at the exact impact location?

The problem is most of the answers either have serious flaws in them or they exclude things to make their point.  Just like the independent "research" of the Pentagon crash.  Basically they said the plane turned into a huge fireball.  If you look at their little mock up video they don't even take the engines into consideration.  You just see a plane wing disintegrate when it hits the building.  I am sure the plane engines (which couldn't fit the hole) just burnt up right on impact.