| Kasz I know right? You could just as eaisly of had "terroirsts" break into the WTC with bombs. Same effect, and you'd need like thousands and thousands less people to pull it off.
|
Or maybe they made it so "complex" so that anyone that had questions could be then made as a fool, idiot, etc... It isn't like a thousand people were directly involved. They could have been involved and not even known it. I already gave instances like the Manhattan Project and tank development during WW1 where numerous people were involved that didn't have the slightest clue what they were actually helping make.
Anyways, I would probably sit back and be able to take "what really happened" as the decent truth if it wasn't the fact of so many things. How the hell does the WTC collapse within 1 hour and the other 2 hours. The fires didn't even look 1/100 as bad as other skyscraper fires which didn't collapse. You even have radio communication from firefighters at the floors of impact saying the fires were sporadic and should be contained/put out soon (right before the collapse). Most of the jet fuel burned outside the buildings at impact. So how does a fire that is barely burning weaken the steel for a building designed to take impacts from jetliner/possibly multiple impacts. You would think that even if it did fail that it would take 10-20 hours at least not 1-2.....







