In my first post i replied to how shoddy the op's evidence was just with common sense... I ended the post saying it may have been an internal job
After reading the bebunking 9/11 website im going to say the "evidence" that the opposition provides is completely whack...
When someone said "pull" is a demolition term I automatically thought... "or it means to pull back to safety" and thats exactly what silverstien said he meant.
When the other side said "no high rise has been collapsed by fires alone" I thought "Has any high rise had a kamakazee fly into them?"
And when someone said "it took 7 seconds for the building to collapse" I thought... "thats weird.... i never knew you could be inside a building which collapsed and survive... because thats the only way he would be able to tell how the internal structure was holding up before the building collapsed. Most likely the building was falling apart internally before it collapsed completely"
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
