I love this mentality.  We can't convince people that our theory is true because we have crappy "evidence" so they must be brainwashed.  Calling people brainwashed is a cop-out.  It means that you can't provide sufficient proof to convert so you hide behind this saying to make you feel better about your flawed opinion.

Let's look at this logically.  There are thousands upon thousands of engineers across the globe.  Now, we can assume that the engineers in the USA are unreliable because they don't want to make their country look bad and I'll concede to that even though it is crap. 

But there is the rest of the world.  The rest of the world that looks for any flaw that the USA has and uses it as ammo against them.  Do you actually think that all those engineers all over the world would just let this slip?  If it was a conspiracy, do you honestly think there wouldn't be thousands of engineers showing conclusively that the towers were in fact detonated?  An engineer in China or Afghanistan has to reason to defend the USA so why aren't they speaking up? 

But no, lets believe a few folks and ignore the vast majority of real engineers with integrity.  I just can't comprehend people that ignore the fact that if planes couldn't cause the towers to collapse then thousands of credible engineers would point it out. 

But I am brainwashed I guess because I use logic.  It's just funny hearing it from you.  It's like a blind man telling me my shirt is pink when it's actually green.

Never has a high rise steel building collapsed because of fire before or after 9/11 but that day it happened "3 times". there was even a test on a high rise steel building in which they burned it as hot as they could for something like 18 hours and it never collapsed but the buildings during 911 did only after a few hours.

jetfuel cannot burn at high enough temperature to cause steel to melt into molten metal.

thermite was found at several differant areas. thermite is used as an explosive and can easily melt steel unlike jetfuel.

Hundreds of evewitnesses reported explosions, Before the planes hit and right before the buildings came down.

All 4 black boxes were never recovered. since they were put into planes only 1 black box has never been recovered(not including planes that crashed in water or plane that crashed at 19k feet).

All 3 buildings fell as if they were demolished. Both the twin towers had week sides because of the planes of if they were to fall they should have fallen over at its weekest points not straight down into its self

George bush lied about seeing the  the plane hit the tower

One of the head guys that was investigating said there was no molten metal week after 911 a clear lie

I would put more but i have to go. Explain to me how these facts are wrong.

I will repeat this again... A Steel reinforced concrete building CANNOT, I repeat, CANNOT implode at the rate of free fall, without explosive devices of some kind being planted. The towers came down in 10 seconds roughly, meaning the buildings came down at a rate of TEN floors per SECOND. Imagine your house. Then stack 4 more of those on top. Then add thick steel reinforcement, including a massive steel core holding them up. You bilnk, and it is all gone, pulverized.. In ONE SECOND. Do you really see such a scenario occuring without explosives?

We show you the facts and then you sweep them under the table ignoring them. This entire time we present solid proof that there was a conspiracy and you guys dont even argue against them you just say something thats irrelevent(like whats bolded). You ignore suck facts as:

Never has a high rise steel building collapsed because of fire before or after 9/11 but that day it happened "3 times". there was even a test on a high rise steel building in which they burned it as hot as they could for something like 18 hours and it never collapsed but the buildings during 911 did only after a few hours.

jetfuel cannot burn at high enough temperature to cause steel to melt into molten metal.

thermite was found at several differant areas. thermite is used as an explosive and can easily melt steel unlike jetfuel.

Hundreds of evewitnesses reported explosions, Before the planes hit and right before the buildings came down.

All 4 black boxes were never recovered. since they were put into planes only 1 black box has never been recovered(not including planes that crashed in water or plane that crashed at 19k feet).

All 3 buildings fell as if they were demolished. Both the twin towers had week sides because of the planes of if they were to fall they should have fallen over at its weekest points not straight down into its self

George bush lied about seeing the  the plane hit the tower

One of the head guys that was investigating said there was no molten metal week after 911 a clear lie

I would put more but i have to go. Explain to me how these facts are wrong.

We show you the facts and then you sweep them under the table ignoring them. This entire time we present solid proof that there was a conspiracy and you guys dont even argue against them you just say something thats irrelevent(like whats bolded). You ignore suck facts as:

Never has a high rise steel building collapsed because of fire before or after 9/11 but that day it happened "3 times". there was even a test on a high rise steel building in which they burned it as hot as they could for something like 18 hours and it never collapsed but the buildings during 911 did only after a few hours.

How often have passenger jets flown into skyscrapers? Most fires don't burn on large quantities of jet fuel and so are not very comparable.

jetfuel cannot burn at high enough temperature to cause steel to melt into molten metal.

The steel didn't melt, it weakened causing the structure to no longer be able to support the weight above it. There is a significant difference between melting and weakening.

thermite was found at several differant areas. thermite is used as an explosive and can easily melt steel unlike jetfuel.

Thermite isn't an explosive (it reacts and gives off heat, but doesn't explode) and also absurd amounts of it would be required to cut through a beam. It doesn't match your explosve theory and wouldn't work for demolishing the WTC anyway.

Hundreds of evewitnesses reported explosions, Before the planes hit and right before the buildings came down.

There are videos of the entire thing from many different angles. Eyewitness reports therefore mean jack, eyewitness reports have always been sketchy evidence (for anything) and when you have hard records of what they were seeing they can basically be discounted.

All 4 black boxes were never recovered. since they were put into planes only 1 black box has never been recovered(not including planes that crashed in water or plane that crashed at 19k feet).

http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010913somersetp3.asp

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/14/pentagon-fire.htm

I'm not sure about the WTC ones, but their loss would hardly be surprising.

All 3 buildings fell as if they were demolished. Both the twin towers had week sides because of the planes of if they were to fall they should have fallen over at its weekest points not straight down into its self

Do you have any actual backing for this idea or is it simply what you intuitively think? Gravity is the driving force and acts directly downwards. Once the structural integrity of the building is compromised that's where the building goes.

George bush lied about seeing the  the plane hit the tower

If all of George Bush's mis-statements were some kind of conspiracy then you'd be up to your ears in them.

One of the head guys that was investigating said there was no molten metal week after 911 a clear lie

I would put more but i have to go. Explain to me how these facts are wrong.

jetfuel cannot burn at high enough temperature to cause steel to melt into molten metal.