pezus said:
thranx said:
the big difference there is that GoW released 2 games over 3 years, not 3 games in 3 years. Something the mainline halos have not done is only have a 1 year dev cycle. I do not think they would release a halo every year (mainline) it would kill a great franchise they have and I feel microsoft is smart enough to nurture halo to a long lengevity.
|
I think they're going to try to top Cod. Some MS guy said at E3 that he truly believed they could top it. If they'll use the same engine like Cod does it could work.
|
There will never be a mainline Halo every year, for starters they simply don't have the resources. At best we'll see a spin off/remake/expansion pack ect.
MS didn't say they want a Halo every year, that quote was taking completely out of context. They want more regular releases yes, that doesn't mean every year and it doesn't mean mainline.
Just because they said a new trilogy on 360, doesn't mean a damn thing!! As you can see from the post above they're already stating 'no comment' on whether they'll be on the next platform.
The only reason Reach and Halo 4 are so close, is that 4 is being worked on by 434, and likely started a year before Reach was out.