Forums - Gaming Discussion - E3: Nintendo WINS!

mysticwolf said:
The WiiU was named so in order to not let go of the casual fanbase of the Wii.


They could of named it 'Wii Ultra, Super Wii, Super Wii 2, Wii^2, Wii Stream,'..........but boy Wii U is just awful , makes Vita sound nice.



 

        

Around the Network

The WiiU was interesting but I hated the games announced at the show... Mario Kart 13, Super mario 93, Mario Spin-off mansion 2. Kid Icarus was the only relatively interesting thing to me when it comes to new stuff and the game just didn't look that fun for me.

I don't know, i guess they won...



4 ≈ One

I agree, Sony's best games were games we already knew about and seen before imo. Nintendo actually showed stuff that was interesting that we didn't know about. I think it's kinda ridiculous how much hate Nintendo is getting for this conference, it was the best of e3 imo. The WiiU has so much potential and so much gameplay possibilities it's just exciting. Sure they could of mentioned more Wii, but they did show Wii games at the end on screen for what it's worth. Overall I thought it was a great conference from Nintendo, great looking hardware with many possibilities.

So in conclusion Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft IMO




most of the arguments that Nintendo did bad are just coming from people using crappy, childish arguments. Guess what? They didn't NEED to announce or show any games for the WiiU, that wasn't the point. The controller alone was enough of an announcement to eclipse anything else shown at E3. But I don't expect "gamers" to understand that.



WFT is Wii U - Is that the console or Controller. I still can't see how people are going to buy the WiiU as cool as it is - it seems expensive.



  Unleash The Beast!  

End of 2011 Sales: Wii = 90mil, 360 = 61mil, PS3= 60mil

Around the Network

What this E3 showed is that E3 is losing relevance. Back in 2004 it would be a huge event, 40 new games would be announced, 'good' celebrities and bands would pop up, better presentations and it was just the ultimate marketing tool. These days it's not. Sony have clearly shown that they prefer Gamescom and TGS over E3 and that they also prefer announcing games through out the year, instead of just bundling them all up for one big event. Microsoft and Nintendo still rely on E3 a little too much, but you can start to see them drifting away from that format. It also doesn't help that all the major releases in the last few years have been announced at the Spike Game Awards.

E3 isn't a spectacle any more, it's just another marketing platform amongst a whole lot of other marketing platforms.

As for who won this E3? I don't know what to think of the new Wii, it look's horribly designed, but the concept looks interesting and I like the idea of a having a nice looking Zelda and a Luigi's Mansion 2. Microsoft shat all over themselves, such a horrible conference, it was all well presented, but what they presented was just horrible. Sony was just boring, they need to hire Microsoft's event managers.

Choosing who won is like picking which piece of fire will burn your eyebrows faster, they all did badly and all for different reasons. If I had to choose, then it'd be not Microsoft.



Bet with Conegamer and AussieGecko that the PS3 will have more exclusives in 2011 than the Wii or 360... or something.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

Saruk said:
I agree, Sony's best games were games we already knew about and seen before imo. Nintendo actually showed stuff that was interesting that we didn't know about. I think it's kinda ridiculous how much hate Nintendo is getting for this conference, it was the best of e3 imo. The WiiU has so much potential and so much gameplay possibilities it's just exciting. Sure they could of mentioned more Wii, but they did show Wii games at the end on screen for what it's worth. Overall I thought it was a great conference from Nintendo, great looking hardware with many possibilities.

So in conclusion Nintendo>Sony>Microsoft IMO




I really don't care about the winner...



Sorry for the dubble post i couldt even write something??

@Saruk

i agree with you buddy.
mario zelda and pokemon are totaly new games i never heard of them before we never expected they would anounce new ips and soo many
i never expected and i never even heard about

mario kart 3ds
new super mario 3ds
super smah bros mario 3ds /wii
zelda skyward sword
zelda 3ds remake
zelda wii u
kid icarus 3ds
pokemon 3ds
pokemon dex
pikmin 3 (dont know why its called pikmin 3 never heard about this before.
luigi mansion2 (definitly not an sequeel)

i man i agree. uncharted 3 unchartes vita resistance 3 inafmous2 they all gonne suck just like uncharted 1 and 2 they where totaly bad games..also the stories chars everything is just the same who wants that?'
and i agree sony only makes sequeels.

the last quardian
heavy rain
modnation
LBP
motorstorm
uncharted
heavenly sword
resistance
infamous
mag

they where all ips that they already had on ps1 and ps2
they where
i already knew about sly recoon4 and dust 512 and bioshock vita

Dude being a fanboy is good.
but dont say things that are stupid.



the nintendo conference was better than the microsoft one but i didn't saw the sony conference so i really can't say who was better.