osamanobama said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
Michael-5 said:
With many people I make short arguement. When people just critisize me (being hypocratic, when really I'm not), and prefer to demean me instead of actually debate, I'll stand my ground and debates do get long. If people replied without the critisism, I promise all arguements are shorter, but I do type a lot.
I mean, if you're going to call me a hypocrite, at least source where I am (not you, we haven't had a debate in....a while)
I don't let the majority, tell me what's right or wrong.
|
like I said I rather not get into with you to be frank. I can list so many things you said that are flat out wrong and I can just as easily show placed you don't apply the same standards for both E3 presentations. but that takes a lot of typing and I don't want to do that
|
and then after all that typing, and constructing of your arguement, he would then still not realize he is wrong and applies huge double standards.
and then you proceed to bang your head repeatedly against your desk in agony and disbelieve
|
You keep saying I'm wrong, I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but where? Dust 514 is PS3 exclusive, and Minecraft is only Kinect enhanced on 360. Those were my errors, at least I admit to them.
What double standards?
disbeleif at what? I can count again. Only 360 has any AAA announcements (Halo 4, I'll remove Halo CEA for you, although it's production costs are higher then Twisted Metal, and many consider that AAA). Also 360 has more games announced (if you count Ryse,). Ignoring the kids games, there are 6 for 360 (Halox2, Ryse, Fable, Dance Central 2, Kinect Sports 2), and 5 for PS3 (Medevil Moves, Sly, Dust 514, God of Way Origins, Ruin,). Starhawk was announced Pre-E3, but even if you count it it's still a tie (I did count Ryse after all). Ontop of that, there are more games enhanced by Kinect then Move (Mass Effect 3, Ghost Recon, EA Sports games, etc vs. Bioshock InFinite).
However this debate is stupid. I produce a point, and you return "You're wrong, and it baffles me that you don't see this", but you don't return a counter-arguement, or bother explaining how I'm wrong. This tells me that you don't have any counter-arguement, or reason to believe that I'm incorrect. I can admit when I'm wrong, I already did above, and I was wrong because I took what someone said in the forums and didn't check it up myself.
Whoever says PS3 or 360 had a way better showing is just plain ignorant. I did let this go too far, but I really get annoyed at ignorance.
P.S. MUGEN, I'll be sure to keep responses shorter for you. Some people love to debate with me, some not so much. I'm a tough cookie :P
