I like the site as it is but if you want to add reviews that would be cool but that takes a lot of time and energy, your also need more mods, and more writers, but I would recommend that you implement changes slowly over time not all at once. Allow users to have their input for every new feature. To add it slowly and see how people react is the best thing in my mind.

You can always add more charts and figures you know.

We don't need to review games on this site, but like Grey Acumen said, a reader review section with a rubric for reviews like Graphics, Gameplay, Difficulty, Replay Value, and Audio. Then you give a score (1-10; 1-5) somethin like that.

Improving sales data so that we can be "the most comprehesive VG charts in the world" would probably be a first start.

And less website glitching up or not being able to reach it.

 I'll 2nd that!

I would like to stay with what we've got, just advertise the site, make it known more across the net, but I don't think we need to change much, just focus on making it the best tracking service in the world

i'd be happy to help aswell if needed. im studying business studies and computing in uni, so im involved alot in, business functions, bsuiness change, web design, graphics, databasing and all that nonsense lol.

There's no doubt VGChartz has the best weekly sales numbers. I sincerely thank you for that.

On the forum/community side I think it cannot get any better at this point with more visitors to the site. In fact I think the forums would go downhill with a greater influx of people because I believe it would lead to more joke accounts being created for the purposes of trolling. Personally I would like to see tighter controls on account creation when you decide to take steps to increase traffic.

We need OFFICIAL REVIEWS like gametrailers, or gamespot, someone on the site makes a review of the game they played and give it an unbiased score.

Well VGchartz is being used by more sites in its news so word is getting out, maybe VGC should issue more PR releases on the data, like when companies fail to meet their goals

Alright, was just making sure that's what you meant.  By going with other sites, like IGN/Gamespot/Whatever, that leaves you with very little control on what happens.  But if you have other people who constantly update a site that you, in the end, have creative control over, that's much better for keeping VGC as VGC and not some mixture of whatever the other sites basically demand as they're much bigger.

The only issue I really see with starting "new" sites, ran by "people" is that they really have to have the dedication to do it.  A preview/review site would be the most challenging, as you actually need to get a hold of so many games and actually spend time playing them, and give honest, unbiased reviews.

I'm all for adding additional sites, as long as it's done properly, isn't too ad invasive, and has a simple, but professional appearance.  A community forum for all is what I'd recommend though, so it's not 3 communities, it's 1 giant one.