By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Vgchartz ranking game -- Super Mario Galaxy 2!

yo_john117 on 03 June 2011
Boutros said:
yo_john117 said:
Boutros said:
RolStoppable said:
non-gravity said:

If my calculations are correct the 5.2 changes the overall score from 9.50 to 9.31

wow such a big deal

...and that coming from the guy who complained that Wii exclusive games get away with scores of 9 and up too often.

But yeah, in the end it doesn't make much of a difference, so I think nobody will take issue if Marco's score is excluded from the average.

I have issues.

I won't have issues if all other unfair scores are excluded from previous games though.

It will be done!

Yay that's awesome! (But so ambitious XD)

Good luck and thanks!

Well I will have help from my minion trasharmdsister12! So it won't be so bad



Around the Network
osamanobama on 03 June 2011
yo_john117 said:
Boutros said:
yo_john117 said:
Boutros said:
RolStoppable said:
non-gravity said:

If my calculations are correct the 5.2 changes the overall score from 9.50 to 9.31

wow such a big deal

...and that coming from the guy who complained that Wii exclusive games get away with scores of 9 and up too often.

But yeah, in the end it doesn't make much of a difference, so I think nobody will take issue if Marco's score is excluded from the average.

I have issues.

I won't have issues if all other unfair scores are excluded from previous games though.

It will be done!

Yay that's awesome! (But so ambitious XD)

Good luck and thanks!

Well I will have help from my minion trasharmdsister12! So it won't be so bad

thanks you_john and tracharmdsister.

now i have no complaints about you not counting marco's score.

good luck, it will be a lot of work



yo_john117 on 03 June 2011
osamanobama said:
yo_john117 said:
Boutros said:
yo_john117 said:
Boutros said:
RolStoppable said:
non-gravity said:

If my calculations are correct the 5.2 changes the overall score from 9.50 to 9.31

wow such a big deal

...and that coming from the guy who complained that Wii exclusive games get away with scores of 9 and up too often.

But yeah, in the end it doesn't make much of a difference, so I think nobody will take issue if Marco's score is excluded from the average.

I have issues.

I won't have issues if all other unfair scores are excluded from previous games though.

It will be done!

Yay that's awesome! (But so ambitious XD)

Good luck and thanks!

Well I will have help from my minion trasharmdsister12! So it won't be so bad

thanks you_john and tracharmdsister.

now i have no complaints about you not counting marco's score.

good luck, it will be a lot of work

Yeah I always strive to make these threads as fair as I can....it will be a lot of work for both me and Mr. trasharm but well worth it.



Conegamer on 04 June 2011
yo_john117 said:

 

Ok so here's the deal guys. Marco's score will not be counted, Non-gravity's score will not be counted because he didn't play the game (was just trying to be funny and make a point) 

 

Now so far I have been pretty lenient on the rules but that is going to change. You break a rule your score won't be counted. As far as rule number 3 stating you have to go into great detail if you rate a game a 5 or lower here's what I want as a minimum of detail and explaining, Something like this is not acceptable. And to clarify i'm not keeping anyone from rating in these games (unless of course they are trying to troll) if you want to rate a game that low (a 5 or below pretty much means you despised the game) I want detail. I'm not going to make people go into detail for rating high scores because thats just pointless.

I'm taking away rule number 2 about 7 being an average because I simply can't enforce it and its a rather pointless rule in hindsight.

I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.

And lastly I will not be having any ranking threads from now until June 13th due to all the E3 buzz that will be happening over the next week or so and to give me time to recount the old threads.

 

That sounds like the right movement. And good luck trying to re-score all your old threads...

I apologise if I caused a bit of an uproar >.<



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Nintendogamer on 04 June 2011

I love nearly everything about the game, the music and the graphics. The game isn't too short nor too long, since there are 242 stars in total, some stars don't take long to find while others do take some time which balances out the game length. All in all the game gets a 9.7/10 from me.



Buying in 2015: Captain toad: treasure tracker,

mario maker

new 3ds

yoshi woolly world

zelda U

majora's mask 3d

Around the Network
yo_john117 on 04 June 2011
Conegamer said:
yo_john117 said:

 

Ok so here's the deal guys. Marco's score will not be counted, Non-gravity's score will not be counted because he didn't play the game (was just trying to be funny and make a point) 

 

Now so far I have been pretty lenient on the rules but that is going to change. You break a rule your score won't be counted. As far as rule number 3 stating you have to go into great detail if you rate a game a 5 or lower here's what I want as a minimum of detail and explaining, Something like this is not acceptable. And to clarify i'm not keeping anyone from rating in these games (unless of course they are trying to troll) if you want to rate a game that low (a 5 or below pretty much means you despised the game) I want detail. I'm not going to make people go into detail for rating high scores because thats just pointless.

I'm taking away rule number 2 about 7 being an average because I simply can't enforce it and its a rather pointless rule in hindsight.

I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.

And lastly I will not be having any ranking threads from now until June 13th due to all the E3 buzz that will be happening over the next week or so and to give me time to recount the old threads.

 

That sounds like the right movement. And good luck trying to re-score all your old threads...

I apologise if I caused a bit of an uproar >.<

Haha no problem man, these threads will be more fair now thanks to you and others.



Conegamer on 04 June 2011
yo_john117 said:
Conegamer said:
yo_john117 said:

 

Ok so here's the deal guys. Marco's score will not be counted, Non-gravity's score will not be counted because he didn't play the game (was just trying to be funny and make a point) 

 

Now so far I have been pretty lenient on the rules but that is going to change. You break a rule your score won't be counted. As far as rule number 3 stating you have to go into great detail if you rate a game a 5 or lower here's what I want as a minimum of detail and explaining, Something like this is not acceptable. And to clarify i'm not keeping anyone from rating in these games (unless of course they are trying to troll) if you want to rate a game that low (a 5 or below pretty much means you despised the game) I want detail. I'm not going to make people go into detail for rating high scores because thats just pointless.

I'm taking away rule number 2 about 7 being an average because I simply can't enforce it and its a rather pointless rule in hindsight.

I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.

And lastly I will not be having any ranking threads from now until June 13th due to all the E3 buzz that will be happening over the next week or so and to give me time to recount the old threads.

 

That sounds like the right movement. And good luck trying to re-score all your old threads...

I apologise if I caused a bit of an uproar >.<

Haha no problem man, these threads will be more fair now thanks to you and others.

Alright then. But after all that it still didn't beat Uncharted 2 anyway ;-(



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

yo_john117 on 04 June 2011
Conegamer said:
yo_john117 said:
Conegamer said:
yo_john117 said:

 

Ok so here's the deal guys. Marco's score will not be counted, Non-gravity's score will not be counted because he didn't play the game (was just trying to be funny and make a point) 

 

Now so far I have been pretty lenient on the rules but that is going to change. You break a rule your score won't be counted. As far as rule number 3 stating you have to go into great detail if you rate a game a 5 or lower here's what I want as a minimum of detail and explaining, Something like this is not acceptable. And to clarify i'm not keeping anyone from rating in these games (unless of course they are trying to troll) if you want to rate a game that low (a 5 or below pretty much means you despised the game) I want detail. I'm not going to make people go into detail for rating high scores because thats just pointless.

I'm taking away rule number 2 about 7 being an average because I simply can't enforce it and its a rather pointless rule in hindsight.

I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.

And lastly I will not be having any ranking threads from now until June 13th due to all the E3 buzz that will be happening over the next week or so and to give me time to recount the old threads.

 

That sounds like the right movement. And good luck trying to re-score all your old threads...

I apologise if I caused a bit of an uproar >.<

Haha no problem man, these threads will be more fair now thanks to you and others.

Alright then. But after all that it still didn't beat Uncharted 2 anyway ;-(

Lol who knows if Uncharted 2 has a really low score without any detail then its score will actually be going up...but I won't know for sure until I start redoing the threads.



Ninpanda on 04 June 2011
yo_john117 said:

Lol who knows if Uncharted 2 has a really low score without any detail then its score will actually be going up...but I won't know for sure until I start redoing the threads.

You might as well skip the Uncharted 2 thread entirely. The lowest score was 8.5. :p



yo_john117 on 04 June 2011
Ninpanda said:
yo_john117 said:

Lol who knows if Uncharted 2 has a really low score without any detail then its score will actually be going up...but I won't know for sure until I start redoing the threads.

You might as well skip the Uncharted 2 thread entirely. The lowest score was 8.5. :p

xDD  Well that settles that one then haha!