Conegamer said:
yo_john117 said:
Conegamer said:
yo_john117 said:
Ok so here's the deal guys. Marco's score will not be counted, Non-gravity's score will not be counted because he didn't play the game (was just trying to be funny and make a point)
Now so far I have been pretty lenient on the rules but that is going to change. You break a rule your score won't be counted. As far as rule number 3 stating you have to go into great detail if you rate a game a 5 or lower here's what I want as a minimum of detail and explaining, Something like this is not acceptable. And to clarify i'm not keeping anyone from rating in these games (unless of course they are trying to troll) if you want to rate a game that low (a 5 or below pretty much means you despised the game) I want detail. I'm not going to make people go into detail for rating high scores because thats just pointless.
I'm taking away rule number 2 about 7 being an average because I simply can't enforce it and its a rather pointless rule in hindsight.
I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.
And lastly I will not be having any ranking threads from now until June 13th due to all the E3 buzz that will be happening over the next week or so and to give me time to recount the old threads.
|
That sounds like the right movement. And good luck trying to re-score all your old threads...
I apologise if I caused a bit of an uproar >.<
|
Haha no problem man, these threads will be more fair now thanks to you and others.
|
Alright then. But after all that it still didn't beat Uncharted 2 anyway ;-(
|
Lol who knows if Uncharted 2 has a really low score without any detail then its score will actually be going up...but I won't know for sure until I start redoing the threads.
