By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Vgchartz ranking game -- Super Mario Galaxy 2!

Conegamer said:
non-gravity said:
Conegamer said:
non-gravity said:

But can people think of enough negative things to lower it from 10 to 5.4? 

Like I said, not a single critic review is below 90%. Undercutting that by over 30% because of 'no story' and 'no HD' is criminal. Take it for what it is. Don't compare it to HD games and you'll be fine. Otherwise all games released pre-this gen would score around 4 because of 'poor graphics!' or 'no online!' etc.

The majority of games in these ranking threads end up below their Metacritic if you'd just take a look at the full list.

I know that. Because people have time to reflect.

But, I find it hard to believe someone thinks it's 33% worse than the lowest review score on Metacritic, and also around 15-20% lower than any other review


the same thing happened to many other games.

also there are tons of high scoresm that people dont expand upon the reasonings



Around the Network

my english is not so good, sorry.

more I can not give unfortunately. @host



the best RPG's are coming 2013 !!!! oh my god, this is perfect for RPG-GAMER = ) Ni No Kuni - 25 january, Time and Eternity, tales of xillia (PS3) and the maybe best game ever: metal gear solid ground zero


10/10

In my opinion this is the pinnacle of all Super Mario games. This game manages to surpass Super Mario Galaxy due to it shear variety, only losing out to it's predecessor in it's overall impact.



Ok so here's the deal guys. Marco's score will not be counted, Non-gravity's score will not be counted because he didn't play the game (was just trying to be funny and make a point) 

 

Now so far I have been pretty lenient on the rules but that is going to change. You break a rule your score won't be counted. As far as rule number 3 stating you have to go into great detail if you rate a game a 5 or lower here's what I want as a minimum of detail and explaining, Something like this is not acceptable. And to clarify i'm not keeping anyone from rating in these games (unless of course they are trying to troll) if you want to rate a game that low (a 5 or below pretty much means you despised the game) I want detail. I'm not going to make people go into detail for rating high scores because thats just pointless.

I'm taking away rule number 2 about 7 being an average because I simply can't enforce it and its a rather pointless rule in hindsight.

I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.

And lastly I will not be having any ranking threads from now until June 13th due to all the E3 buzz that will be happening over the next week or so and to give me time to recount the old threads.



Boutros said:
RolStoppable said:
non-gravity said:

If my calculations are correct the 5.2 changes the overall score from 9.50 to 9.31

wow such a big deal

...and that coming from the guy who complained that Wii exclusive games get away with scores of 9 and up too often.

But yeah, in the end it doesn't make much of a difference, so I think nobody will take issue if Marco's score is excluded from the average.

I have issues.

I won't have issues if all other unfair scores are excluded from previous games though.

It will be done!



Around the Network

Vgchartz score -- 9.41

GamrReview -- 9.6

Highest score was 10, lowest was 7.1

 

1 trasharmdsister12 9

2 Lostplanet22 9

3 Mr Khan 9.5

4 c03n3nj0 9.5

5 Smeags 10

6 Roma 10

7 SvennoJ 8

8 Mad55 9.5

9 MrT-Tar 9.8

10 milkyjoe 9.9

11 Fab_GS 9.3

12 Ninpanda 8.5

13 manuel 10

14 TruckOSaurus 9.7

15 RolStoppable 9.5

16 Conegamer 10

17 mysticwolf 9.5

18 SmokedHostage 9.6

19 miz1q2w3e 10

20 snfr 9.4

21 DarkCronos 9.8

22 d21lewis 9.5

23 KylieDog 8

24 dsage01 7.1

25 Jumpin 10

26 kopstudent89 10

27 freebs2 9.5

28 Rainbow Yoshi 10


263.6/28 = 9.41

 



trasharmdsister12 said:
yo_john117 said:

 

I will be going through all the previous ranking threads to recount by the current rules.....that means low scores with little detail will be taken out so expect the scores for the many of the threads to change. This will be a good thing because I now have a more solid way of counting the scores up so there will be way less margin of error.

 

If you wanna split up the work I'd be more than happy to help. Just give me a range of games based on the scores (like you redo the games with the top half scores and I redo those with the bottom half).

That would be amazing man! Do you want to take the ones that are 8.0-8.99 and I'll take 7.0-7.99 and 9.0-10.

And there's no hurry to do them all at once so just take your time....just send me a message whenever you finish with the edited score and who scored what and i'll edit the OP's(or let me know that the score doesn't need to be changed) 



trasharmdsister12 said:
yo_john117 said:

That would be amazing man! Do you want to take the ones that are 8.0-8.99 and I'll take 7.0-7.99 and 9.0-10.

And there's no hurry to do them all at once so just take your time....just send me a message whenever you finish with the edited score and who scored what and i'll edit the OP's(or let me know that the score doesn't need to be changed) 


Will do boss.

Thank you much! I appreciate it!



I avoided this review, because I feel I might overrate it based on others who reviewed it badly. . . unless I did post in this thread before....just don't remember. Anyways keep up the good work.



 

yo_john117 said:
Boutros said:
RolStoppable said:
non-gravity said:

If my calculations are correct the 5.2 changes the overall score from 9.50 to 9.31

wow such a big deal

...and that coming from the guy who complained that Wii exclusive games get away with scores of 9 and up too often.

But yeah, in the end it doesn't make much of a difference, so I think nobody will take issue if Marco's score is excluded from the average.

I have issues.

I won't have issues if all other unfair scores are excluded from previous games though.

It will be done!

Yay that's awesome! (But so ambitious XD)

Good luck and thanks!