Vgchartz ranking game -- Super Mario Galaxy 2!

[osamanobama]

Conegamer said:

non-gravity said:

Conegamer said:

non-gravity said:

But can people think of enough negative things to lower it from 10 to 5.4? 

Like I said, not a single critic review is below 90%. Undercutting that by over 30% because of 'no story' and 'no HD' is criminal. Take it for what it is. Don't compare it to HD games and you'll be fine. Otherwise all games released pre-this gen would score around 4 because of 'poor graphics!' or 'no online!' etc.

The majority of games in these ranking threads end up below their Metacritic if you'd just take a look at the full list.

I know that. Because people have time to reflect.

But, I find it hard to believe someone thinks it's 33% worse than the lowest review score on Metacritic, and also around 15-20% lower than any other review

the same thing happened to many other games.

also there are tons of high scoresm that people dont expand upon the reasonings