It's more of a cult to be honest.

Are't all religions "cults"?

I'm not religious, and my morals don't come from any religion. And Christianity actually borrowed most of it's moral principles froom the Greek phislosphers, Confucianism was a philosiphical system that was turned by it's adepts into a religion etc. Morals come from philosophy, and are reflections on the best way to behave, in order for society to work. They have nothing to do with supernatural forces.

I wouldn't say so, religions are formed of a wide variety of beliefs and interpretations. One Christian is not the same as the next, for example. Where as a cult, this disparity in thinking across the group is almost non-existant.

Your morals might not but society's as a whole does. It's religion that established the morals, religious spread was/is far stronger then common thinking or philosphy. Christianity might have borrowed views on western morality choices but what of the rest of the world? Many regions have their own views on morality unconnected to Christianity yet these areas do have faiths which contain those definitions of right and wrong.

This is true, but in a small, tight community, doesn't the religion become a cult? For example, Christianity at large is a religion, but doesn't each individual local Church congregation act as a cult?

I already gave Confucianism as an example. Confucius wasn't a religious leader, but after his death the followers of his philosophical belief created a religion around him. All morals are a result of philosophy, they are not dictated by some supernatural force. Religion may perpetuate some morals, but the problem with religion as a source for morals is that it takes the morals from the logical system in which they were created. It demands it's adherents to blindly follow those morals, considers them absolute, and rejects any change (a serious flaw, because as human knowledge advances, some morals become irrational and even dangerous).

Nowadays people think more than they used to, and lots of them choose what morals to follow based on rational thought, rather that it was written in some book.

I already gave Confucianism as an example. Confucius wasn't a religious leader, but after his death the followers of his philosophical belief created a religion around him. All morals are a result of philosophy, they are not dictated by some supernatural force. Religion may perpetuate some morals, but the problem with religion as a source for morals is that it takes the morals from the logical system in which they were created. It demands it's adherents to blindly follow those morals, considers them absolute, and rejects any change (a serious flaw, because as human knowledge advances, some morals become irrational and even dangerous).

Nowadays people think more than they used to, and lots of them choose what morals to follow based on rational thought, rather that it was written in some book.