| ssj12 said: SF64 is a sequel not a remake. It borrowed a lot of elements that was supposed to be in StarFox 2 on the NES. In the first game you play as Fox McCloud's father. |
Same intro... same stages... same characters... same bosses... REMAKE.
Like Evil Dead 2 is a remake from Evil Dead... not a new movie.
| Hephaestos said: no remakes... especially for this type of game.... I mean an FF where the story and events are what make the game, sure... but a shooter.... |
star fox isnt a shooter... its an aerial combat game.....
ssj12 said:
|
that's beyong the point... this game is based on the gameplay, not the story so making a new one is rather easy.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
ethomaz said:
Same intro... same stages... same characters... same bosses... REMAKE. |
wrong. wrong. wrong. wrong. wrong.
Its a spin-off which counts as a sequel. They take elements of the original story and retold them in a different way. The game also features many NEW BOSSES not seen in the original game, plus a few homages like the secret path boss in the first level. Andross is still different, all new features were taken from StarFox 2 like all-range mode, multiplayer and everything else.
ethomaz said:
Same intro... same stages... same characters... same bosses... REMAKE. |
Not to totally explode this thread but...does that make Other M a remake of Super Metroid?
Just playing devils advocate. I do think Star Fox 64 takes pretty much everything from the original game, but its not exactly a remake. Its more like a upgraded sequel with new gameplay. Just lke Ocarina is NOT a remake of Link to the Past.
Six upcoming games you should look into:
Hephaestos said:
that's beyong the point... this game is based on the gameplay, not the story so making a new one is rather easy. |
the story in StarFox and StarFox 64 was very well done and spoken for using the gameplay...
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Not to totally explode this thread but...does that make Other M a remake of Super Metroid? Just playing devils advocate. I do think Star Fox 64 takes pretty much everything from the original game, but its not exactly a remake. Its more like a upgraded sequel with new gameplay. Just lke Ocarina is NOT a remake of Link to the Past. |
Metroid Other M take place between Super and Fusion = NO REMAKE.
Zelda: Ocarina of Time take place before the first four Zeldas = NO REMAKE.
StarFox 64 take same place... same history = REMAKE.
Sequel is always a different story (related or not)... remake remains the same.
My first example...
Evil Dead = Original
Evil Dead 2 = Remake (same history... so different film)
Evil Dead 3 = Sequel (continues the story of Evil Dead/Evil Dead 2)
ssj12 said:
In the first game you play as Fox McCloud's father. |
No. Yeah, it took some things from the unreleased Snes sequel but it's not the sequel. For the record, Twin Snakes took a lot of elements from MGS2 but it's not a sequel. Resident Evil changed a lot of things inthe Gamecube version that wasn't in the PS1 version. It's not a sequel, either.
And no. You never played a James McCloud in the SNES game.
ssj12 said:
|
Aerial combat games are generally 3rd person shooters unless you are in cockpit mode which makes them FPS =P
dahuman said:
|
Actually, flight combat games are a different genre than regular shooter games. Putting in Star Fox 64 and Call of Duty: Black Ops into the same genre is ... well I'm sure you understand it. Are you just being fecetious? >_>
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
