Remake Starfox, not Starfox 64

[ethomaz]

Kenryoku_Maxis said:

ethomaz said:

ssj12 said:

SF64 is a sequel not a remake. It borrowed a lot of elements that was supposed to be in StarFox 2 on the NES.

In the first game you play as Fox McCloud's father.

Same intro... same stages... same characters... same bosses... REMAKE.

Not to totally explode this thread but...does that make Other M a remake of Super Metroid?

Just playing devils advocate.  I do think Star Fox 64 takes pretty much everything from the original game, but its not exactly a remake.  Its more like a upgraded sequel with new gameplay.  Just lke Ocarina is NOT a remake of Link to the Past.

Metroid Other M take place between Super and Fusion = NO REMAKE.
Zelda: Ocarina of Time take place before the first four Zeldas = NO REMAKE.
StarFox 64 take same place... same history = REMAKE.

Sequel is always a different story (related or not)... remake remains the same.

My first example...

Evil Dead = Original
Evil Dead 2 = Remake (same history... so different film)
Evil Dead 3 = Sequel (continues the story of Evil Dead/Evil Dead 2)