TRios_Zen said:
You are making a couple of fairly egregious assumptions, no offense: 1) IF you don't know how the sampling was done, than jumping to the conclusion that it was done, NOT randomly, is, well...I'm just not sure how you make that jump without introducing personal bias (ie, I dont like what it said, so I don't *think* it was random, so it wasn't). |
I have a problem accepting the survey becuase it just seems poorly reported. Trusted sources generally provide a plethora of information about the study (margins of error, how they retrieved their samples, how the questions were phrased). When a study does not provide this information, it immediately raises a red flag for me. The survey could be legitimate, but I would not accept it until I saw this information. Needless to say, its also a little odd that the spokesman for the company does not even seem to recognize what the survey questions asked (doesn't differentiate between the terms considering and deciding in his quote).