Garnett said:
EA is no different than Activision, They are still greedy bastards none the less. |
have you ever had, have, or intend to have a job? my god, you whore. what a greedy bastard you are ...
Garnett said:
EA is no different than Activision, They are still greedy bastards none the less. |
have you ever had, have, or intend to have a job? my god, you whore. what a greedy bastard you are ...
I wouldnt doubt Ms probably threw some cash on the table, to keep Ea from whoreing it for awhile!
would be wise

Garnett said:
EA is no different than Activision, They are still greedy bastards none the less. |
What? No. Why hookers? If they are running on an engine that works on more than one platform, why would you not release it on more than 1 platform? They were losing money last time I checked, so increasing income might be an idea...
Garnett said:
You want your hookers to sleep as many people as possible, to get the most money, fuck morals. |
So, making a multiplatform game is moraly wrong becaaaause...?
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
| Garnett said: If its EA, its multiplatform..They like to whore their stuff out. |
Uhm, what? How is being multiplatform whoring your stuff out? You're increasing your income so you can keep creating more games that are also hopefully better. Does Ubisoft whore their stuff out too? Activision? Valve? Rockstar? Konami? Microsoft? Nintendo? THQ?
Second of all, BioWare's games have been multiplatform for ages. When they were owned by Microsoft, the games were on both the Xbox and PC. I guess that means BioWare were whores before EA ever purchased them...
kitler53 said:
have you ever had, have, or intend to have a job? my god, you whore. what a greedy bastard you are ... |
don't feed the troll. he talks nonsense thats all...
Munkeh111 said:
What? No. Why hookers? If they are running on an engine that works on more than one platform, why would you not release it on more than 1 platform? They were losing money last time I checked, so increasing income might be an idea... |
I never said it was wrong to release it on more than one platform... All i said, was they whore their stuff out, and theres nothing wrong with that...
They're losing money because they dont know how to keep development cost low... Personally i dont care about this whole topic, but just because this thread is making it look like a 360 exclusive, i just had to say its EA so its gonna be on all systems...
Rainbird said:
Uhm, what? How is being multiplatform whoring your stuff out? You're increasing your income so you can keep creating more games that are also hopefully better. Does Ubisoft whore their stuff out too? Activision? Valve? Rockstar? Konami? Microsoft? Nintendo? THQ? Second of all, BioWare's games have been multiplatform for ages. When they were owned by Microsoft, the games were on both the Xbox and PC. I guess that means BioWare were whores before EA ever purchased them... |
Microsoft never fully owned Bioware they were microsoft 2nd party , just like bizzare was
Rainbird said:
Uhm, what? How is being multiplatform whoring your stuff out? You're increasing your income so you can keep creating more games that are also hopefully better. Does Ubisoft whore their stuff out too? Activision? Valve? Rockstar? Konami? Microsoft? Nintendo? THQ? Second of all, BioWare's games have been multiplatform for ages. When they were owned by Microsoft, the games were on both the Xbox and PC. I guess that means BioWare were whores before EA ever purchased them... |
Bioware was never owned by Microsft. That is the problem.