Best 3rd place ever
PSN: Saugeen-Uwo Feel free to add me (put Vg Chartz as MSG)!
Nintendo Network ID: Saugeen-Uwo
Best 3rd place ever
PSN: Saugeen-Uwo Feel free to add me (put Vg Chartz as MSG)!
Nintendo Network ID: Saugeen-Uwo
kowenicki said:
|
I didn't necessarily disagree either! :P
Acevil said:
The thing is, i think Microsoft has been smart this generation, on making their brand at least in terms of North America, really sucessful, and the third party will remain, because the relationship that have been formed is really strong. The problem for Microsoft really lies with Japan, and their situation in that market. EMEAA seems to be coin flip, with brands shifting back and forth. Microsoft relationship with Activision, is also something that might have to be watched out for, and see what happens in that market. They also most likely will form more exclusives, like they did in the start of this generation (why I originally bought a 360, when I dislike the xbox brand). Thanks for clarifying the statement about library, was some what confused. While I personally feel it is the strongest, I always see media favoring 360 in terms of library and in terms of console of choice, one reason or another. Even in metacritic you will see that 360 gets reviewed favourably over the same game. I still am not sure about the top statement. I think ps3 will have trouble reaching 100 million milestone, but I am not sure what 3 years down the line might be. Of course quality is subjective, and I agree with the general sentiment, just not the overall statement. |
I must disagree with the library. There are far too many PS3 exclusives now which are considered to be AAA titles (Uncharted, Killzone, LBP, Heavy Rain, GT, R&C to name a few) versus the 360 offering (Gears of War, Halo, Alan Wake, Forza). Multi-plat has been in 360's favour withd evelopment but the games are reaching equilibrium between them.
PSN: Saugeen-Uwo Feel free to add me (put Vg Chartz as MSG)!
Nintendo Network ID: Saugeen-Uwo
kowenicki said:
I know... |
All well that ends well I guess, I just love arguing in a civil manner! :P
CGI-Quality said:
A better question is why are you always so negative towards anything Sony? OT: A milestone indeed. May it continue on as long as it can! |
I am not familiar with ZaneWane in general, but it is quite clear he didn't start the negativity or console warring there...
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
Euphoria14 said:
I also believe that people keep using the bad start to this generation as a reason to keep knocking down what Sony has accomplished or rather what momentum they could now bring into the following gen considering how they have done things that no other console has done before. Yes the PS3 started bad, Sony fucked up and the console ALMOST could have died.
But that was 4-5 years ago. It is time to move on. |
Ex fucking actly!
its like knocking 360 success because of the catastrophic xbox1 performance, thats already passed its behind us.
Euphoria14 said: I also believe that people keep using the bad start to this generation as a reason to keep knocking down what Sony has accomplished or rather what momentum they could now bring into the following gen considering how they have done things that no other console has done before. Yes the PS3 started bad, Sony fucked up and the console ALMOST could have died.
But that was 4-5 years ago. It is time to move on. |
Only question, since I do this for every console by the way. Shouldn't a console success be governed by the total life span of the console, and the total profit-loss gain of that product?
Unless an organization is a non-profit organization in which case, awareness, and other things are measurement of success.
BTW when does the actual quarter reports from the big 3 comes out?
I think fanboys in general over-analyze sunk costs. Executives / investors view them differently than fanboys do.
The fact remains that Sony went from being down in the dumps at the beginning of the gen to being the #1 selling home console (on a weekly basis) at the end of the generation. No console has ever done that.
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials
Conservatives: Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.
Acevil said:
I was sort of confused on what metric the user was using, but in terms of the only measurable metric, I would say software sales seem stronger, but I thought it might be about quality titles as well, which I assumed that 360 still has more titles ranked 80 , 90 compared to ps3, but I don't like the rating method. |
I disagree.
PS3 had today more diversity and ranked over 80 games... there are no comparison here.