By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PSN vs XBL which is better?

 

PSN vs XBL which is better?

PSN 187 40.22%
 
XBL 206 44.30%
 
SAME 34 7.31%
 
obama saved or created 465 million jobs 36 7.74%
 
Total:463
deskpro2k3 on 02 April 2011

I have to agree with mantlepiecek. psn does what i want it to do for free. I dont give a hoot about friends profile or if they're picking their nose etc.. case close.

I mean if you're into those things then i salute you.



Around the Network
homer on 02 April 2011
d21lewis said:
homer said:
RolStoppable said:

PSN is vastly superior, because it has a better selection of downloadable games.


I disagree. Until psn gets UNO, it will continue to be laughable in my eyes.


Forever the champion of truth and justice, I have to tell you:  PSN DOES have Uno.  They got it last year.

Shit just got real.

WTF. When did this happen? PSN=XBL FINALLY



"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius

oniyide on 02 April 2011

^^^ Uno was released the same day as the one on 360, i think your thinking about UNO rush which is still 360 exclusive, further more the regular Uno was released on Wii DS and PSP, so their's an UNO for all



AussieGecko on 03 April 2011
mantlepiecek said:

For people thinking PSN has lag or any other issues compared to live(regarding gameplay):

Its an interesting experiment of Call of duty 4 being played on both the 360 and PS3.


where is this? the issue is not america it is australia and all non us places.



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

GuiltySpartan77 on 03 April 2011

Whats the point in comparing the two even if they are exactly the same MS made the better decision in charging for there service so if you ask me Sony looks like the fools when it comes to wether to charge for there service or not. But hey you obviously like PSN better than XBL thanks for your opinion. 



Around the Network
mantlepiecek on 03 April 2011
AussieGecko said:
mantlepiecek said:

For people thinking PSN has lag or any other issues compared to live(regarding gameplay):

Its an interesting experiment of Call of duty 4 being played on both the 360 and PS3.


where is this? the issue is not america it is australia and all non us places.

I think its US, but it wouldn't matter either way.



AussieGecko on 03 April 2011
mantlepiecek said:

I think its US, but it wouldn't matter either way.


do you live in US? if so it makes why this is would be your response. As an Australian my game sources are quite low so we have to build up our numbers o/s as well which means playing people from o/s as well.



 

Bet with Conegamer and Doobie_wop 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3879752

mantlepiecek on 03 April 2011
AussieGecko said:
mantlepiecek said:

I think its US, but it wouldn't matter either way.


do you live in US? if so it makes why this is would be your response. As an Australian my game sources are quite low so we have to build up our numbers o/s as well which means playing people from o/s as well.

 

I have friends on the US PSN as well as EU and they pretty much agree with me.

What does the bolded mean, I am not understanding.



Squilliam on 03 April 2011

Thats like asking which is better between Toyota and Ford, most people quite frankly don't give a crap. Enthusiast opinions are crap, which leaves you in a quagmire of people who give a crap giving crap answers vs people who have crap all to say who actually don't give a crap about the differences.

 



Tease.

brendude13 on 03 April 2011
kowenicki said:

who cares?

I like red wine, my wife prefer white wine...

One thing...  cost, or lack of, is irrelevant in this comparison.  If it is deemed relevant then you better also factor in the fact that some people paid £425 for their PS3 to access this free service whilst others paid £129 to access the paid for service.

 

?

No comprendo amigo.