What are you doing then? Aren't you basing the comparisons on youtube videos as well?

Do you have the game? Have you played both of them together to compare them?

Crysis 2 looks better than all those 3 vids.

The KZ3 vid u chose is poor because it shows a huge pre-animated monster á la God of War. I bet there are better ones.

There are levels of Uncharted 2 that look better than those two vids.

Have you even watched those Crysis 2 videos? They're insane!

Honestly the only video you posted that looks just as good as the Crysis videos posted was the KZ3 one...why would you pick the worst videos ever of Uncharted 2?

Needless to say from what I've seen in the videos Crysis 2 is comparable to KZ3.

But like I have said in other threads I will save my final judgement for when I actually play Crysis 2.

I don't know why you think huge set pieces are amazing, they are not.  If anything, the size is arbitrary and the textures needed don't have to be as high detail as closer models.  Serious Sam 1 had huge bosses too and threw lots of things at you at the same time.

From looking at those videos, Killzone reminds me of Quake 4 with some postprocessing effects.  Uncharted 2 had some good scenes, but aside from a decent lighting model it looks pretty standard.  Crysis 2 looked pretty standard except for that 3rd video where it was showing lighting effects underwater, that was classic Crysis and it was impressive to see running on consoles.

Overall, all of those engines looked about the same in terms of texture detail as expected since both consoles have roughly the same amount of video RAM.  All the games had compromises, but usually in places where the player won't notice until they are looking for those things.  It looks like all the console games still target a rather unimpressive 30FPS.  I'll take 60 FPS over visuals anyday.

The graphical differences between the 360 and PS3 isn't anything to write home about, and I think most of the public agrees.

you are the only one that thinks that.

it simply not true, killzone has some of the best (read best) explosions and flames in the biz. sites like lense of true and digital foundry confirm thta.

also i hasnt noticed any ragdoll physics in crysis, after you die, you go stiff as a board, it really weird and im not used to that in games

have you seen the image clarity on killzone 3? the explosions and animations they are much much better than crysis 2. CR2 is a looker but i feel COD would be more of a comparison as they seem to be similar

Let's all agree and say that FFXIII is the best looking game on consoles.

youd be surprised.

but dont get ahead of your self the very much could get the resolution to 720p with a more recent build.

you might be eating crow later.

but, imo crysis cant wont look better than the games you mentioned because it doesnt even touch much of the spe's of the cell, thats the flaw in multiplatform engines, they are built for xbox and pc architecture in mind, but hardly ever tap into the cell. sony 1st party devs, build their engines around the cell and the ps3, and only the ps3, so they fully take advantage of it power, that why no game will look better than the killzones unchrted 2, 3, and GOW

i said that at the begining the animations are very poor in CR2 judging from demo and gunplay was awful, look at char models in uncharted 1 2 compared to crysis 2

congratulations, you have done the exact same thing