madskillz said: I was talking to a few men - in their 40s and 50s about video games (I am the video game blogger for the newspaper). They were all goo-gooing over my DS Lite and we started talking about the PS3. I told one of the gents that he should buy a 40gb PS3 if he wants to watch movies - but not play PS2 games. And just like clockwork, he was like 'But I thought all PS3s could play PS2 games?' And once again, he proved what I know folks are thinking. They *assume* every PS3 can play PS2 games. And with the PS brand, you can *trust* it.
I really, really believe a lot of folks are buying it thinking they can play their PS2 games. I can't wait to see a class-action lawsuit on the matter.
You don't have to believe me - ask potential customers about the PS3 and why they want it and see what they say. Folks will buy it for their children because they asked. They will walk into a Gamestop and head for the cheap PS2 games and be sadly mistaken.
|
Wow, one person tells you "I thought the 40 gig plays PS2 games?" and you assume that everyone thinks the same way. To be honest, as harsh as it may be, I think that you are full of shit, and I don't see how anyone can take you seriously.
What's in it for you if Sony and the PS3 finish in third this gen? Will you have a joygasm knowing that your Wii and 360 finished first and second respectively? Seriously why do you care about how Sony performs this gen. If Sony failed, what great would it do to the gaming market as a whole?
This "Console War" produced two thing that everyone likes, price cuts and great games. The same applies to the HD war as well. Competition is the best thing for the customers on both the gaming and HD market, and I think everyone can agree with that.