By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Dragon Quest X Wii -- Where is it?

hikaruchan said:
darthdevidem01 said:
ryuzaki57 said:

It's on its way to be ported to PS3

Or to 3DS which is more likely


Yes 3DS looks most likely at this stage but you never know Square-Enix might have shifted development to PS3 because of poor of sales of JRPGs on Wii.

Probably not to PS3, as it WAS slated for PS3 initially and then cancelled. I doubt they'd double back without much on paper to convince them of such



The Carnival of Shadows - Folk Punk from Asbury Park, New Jersey

http://www.thecarnivalofshadows.com 


Around the Network


"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."  --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials 

 

Conservatives:  Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.

 

Raze said:
hikaruchan said:
darthdevidem01 said:
ryuzaki57 said:

It's on its way to be ported to PS3

Or to 3DS which is more likely


Yes 3DS looks most likely at this stage but you never know Square-Enix might have shifted development to PS3 because of poor of sales of JRPGs on Wii.

Probably not to PS3, as it WAS slated for PS3 initially and then cancelled. I doubt they'd double back without much on paper to convince them of such

Source?  I don't remember it being slated for PS3 at all.



"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."  --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials 

 

Conservatives:  Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.

 

hikaruchan said:

I didn't think Gen canted in Spin-offs discussions and KH Coded was on NDS to released in 2010. But I guess we will have to agree to disagree on FFTYPE-0 and FFVersusXIII everybody has there own definition on what determines a Spin-Off.

Not sure why you'd think when I said "spinoffs this gen" and already listed the DS remake of Coded?



hikaruchan said:
Acevil said:
 


I think the problem is the perception you have of spin-off, because Jarrod pretty much summed it up.  I think you might hold a biased, since you might views spin-off as a negative, when generally it is a positive.

For example SMT: Persona series is a spin-off series, yet it is widely considered by SMT fans to be one of the best, if not better than mainline SMT or MT. 

Type-0 series is without a doubt a new final fantasy series that spun-off of Final Fantasy name. If it was called just Type-0 it was be a new series all together with final fantasy like elements. 

Versus it might be arguable by some, but it is pretty much a spinoff  game from the Final Fantasy 13 brand. 

I think the some Game series Spin-Offs are not regarded as equal with the Original product. but sub seires I believe can be debatable if they are rally Spin-Offs or not.

Like Persona that is a sub series of SMT so it can be debatable if it is a Spin-Off or not. 

and it can be argued that DMC, Oinmusha and Dino Crisis are just Spin-Offs of Biohazard despite not having the name Biohazard on the cover anywhere.        


No.  It isn't debatable.

At all.

A spinoff is ANYTHING that "spins off" the main franchise.

That's the literal definition of a spinoff.  It has nothing to do with opinion.  It's like argueing that a Penguin isn't a bird because you have your own specialized definition of bird which requires "Must be able to fly."

It's not debatable... your just wrong and working off a fabricated definition.



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
hikaruchan said:
Acevil said:
 


I think the problem is the perception you have of spin-off, because Jarrod pretty much summed it up.  I think you might hold a biased, since you might views spin-off as a negative, when generally it is a positive.

For example SMT: Persona series is a spin-off series, yet it is widely considered by SMT fans to be one of the best, if not better than mainline SMT or MT. 

Type-0 series is without a doubt a new final fantasy series that spun-off of Final Fantasy name. If it was called just Type-0 it was be a new series all together with final fantasy like elements. 

Versus it might be arguable by some, but it is pretty much a spinoff  game from the Final Fantasy 13 brand. 

I think the some Game series Spin-Offs are not regarded as equal with the Original product. but sub seires I believe can be debatable if they are rally Spin-Offs or not.

Like Persona that is a sub series of SMT so it can be debatable if it is a Spin-Off or not. 

and it can be argued that DMC, Oinmusha and Dino Crisis are just Spin-Offs of Biohazard despite not having the name Biohazard on the cover anywhere.        


No.  It isn't debatable.

At all.

A spinoff is ANYTHING that "spins off" the main franchise.

That's the literal definition of a spinoff.  It has nothing to do with opinion.  It's like argueing that a Penguin isn't a bird because you have your own specialized definition of bird which requires "Must be able to fly."

It's not debatable... your just wrong and working off a fabricated definition.


Not siding with anyone here, but if we are going by straight spin off definitions, then Mario is a Donkey Kong spin off. After all, Mario made his debut in a game called Donkey Kong and since then he has had his own games, but only because it's appearance at the first Donkey Kong game.



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies

trestres said:
Kasz216 said:
hikaruchan said:
Acevil said:
 


I think the problem is the perception you have of spin-off, because Jarrod pretty much summed it up.  I think you might hold a biased, since you might views spin-off as a negative, when generally it is a positive.

For example SMT: Persona series is a spin-off series, yet it is widely considered by SMT fans to be one of the best, if not better than mainline SMT or MT. 

Type-0 series is without a doubt a new final fantasy series that spun-off of Final Fantasy name. If it was called just Type-0 it was be a new series all together with final fantasy like elements. 

Versus it might be arguable by some, but it is pretty much a spinoff  game from the Final Fantasy 13 brand. 

I think the some Game series Spin-Offs are not regarded as equal with the Original product. but sub seires I believe can be debatable if they are rally Spin-Offs or not.

Like Persona that is a sub series of SMT so it can be debatable if it is a Spin-Off or not. 

and it can be argued that DMC, Oinmusha and Dino Crisis are just Spin-Offs of Biohazard despite not having the name Biohazard on the cover anywhere.        


No.  It isn't debatable.

At all.

A spinoff is ANYTHING that "spins off" the main franchise.

That's the literal definition of a spinoff.  It has nothing to do with opinion.  It's like argueing that a Penguin isn't a bird because you have your own specialized definition of bird which requires "Must be able to fly."

It's not debatable... your just wrong and working off a fabricated definition.


Not siding with anyone here, but if we are going by straight spin off definitions, then Mario is a Donkey Kong spin off. After all, Mario made his debut in a game called Donkey Kong and since then he has had his own games, but only because it's appearance at the first Donkey Kong game.

Correct?



Kasz216 said:
trestres said:
Kasz216 said:
hikaruchan said:
Acevil said:
 


I think the problem is the perception you have of spin-off, because Jarrod pretty much summed it up.  I think you might hold a biased, since you might views spin-off as a negative, when generally it is a positive.

For example SMT: Persona series is a spin-off series, yet it is widely considered by SMT fans to be one of the best, if not better than mainline SMT or MT. 

Type-0 series is without a doubt a new final fantasy series that spun-off of Final Fantasy name. If it was called just Type-0 it was be a new series all together with final fantasy like elements. 

Versus it might be arguable by some, but it is pretty much a spinoff  game from the Final Fantasy 13 brand. 

I think the some Game series Spin-Offs are not regarded as equal with the Original product. but sub seires I believe can be debatable if they are rally Spin-Offs or not.

Like Persona that is a sub series of SMT so it can be debatable if it is a Spin-Off or not. 

and it can be argued that DMC, Oinmusha and Dino Crisis are just Spin-Offs of Biohazard despite not having the name Biohazard on the cover anywhere.        


No.  It isn't debatable.

At all.

A spinoff is ANYTHING that "spins off" the main franchise.

That's the literal definition of a spinoff.  It has nothing to do with opinion.  It's like argueing that a Penguin isn't a bird because you have your own specialized definition of bird which requires "Must be able to fly."

It's not debatable... your just wrong and working off a fabricated definition.


Not siding with anyone here, but if we are going by straight spin off definitions, then Mario is a Donkey Kong spin off. After all, Mario made his debut in a game called Donkey Kong and since then he has had his own games, but only because it's appearance at the first Donkey Kong game.

Correct?

I guess so, but I've never heard anyone say Mario was a spinoff. That's why I'm saying this. It is based on opinion sometimes, or else try to argue with people that Mario is a spinoff and not a main series. Not saying that what you said is factually incorrect, but sometimes it being correct doesn't mean that the majority will embrace it. I think there's a thin line between a game being a spinoff or not.



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies

trestres said:
Kasz216 said:
trestres said:
Kasz216 said:
hikaruchan said:
Acevil said:
 


I think the problem is the perception you have of spin-off, because Jarrod pretty much summed it up.  I think you might hold a biased, since you might views spin-off as a negative, when generally it is a positive.

For example SMT: Persona series is a spin-off series, yet it is widely considered by SMT fans to be one of the best, if not better than mainline SMT or MT. 

Type-0 series is without a doubt a new final fantasy series that spun-off of Final Fantasy name. If it was called just Type-0 it was be a new series all together with final fantasy like elements. 

Versus it might be arguable by some, but it is pretty much a spinoff  game from the Final Fantasy 13 brand. 

I think the some Game series Spin-Offs are not regarded as equal with the Original product. but sub seires I believe can be debatable if they are rally Spin-Offs or not.

Like Persona that is a sub series of SMT so it can be debatable if it is a Spin-Off or not. 

and it can be argued that DMC, Oinmusha and Dino Crisis are just Spin-Offs of Biohazard despite not having the name Biohazard on the cover anywhere.        


No.  It isn't debatable.

At all.

A spinoff is ANYTHING that "spins off" the main franchise.

That's the literal definition of a spinoff.  It has nothing to do with opinion.  It's like argueing that a Penguin isn't a bird because you have your own specialized definition of bird which requires "Must be able to fly."

It's not debatable... your just wrong and working off a fabricated definition.


Not siding with anyone here, but if we are going by straight spin off definitions, then Mario is a Donkey Kong spin off. After all, Mario made his debut in a game called Donkey Kong and since then he has had his own games, but only because it's appearance at the first Donkey Kong game.

Correct?

I guess so, but I've never heard anyone say Mario was a spinoff. That's why I'm saying this. It is based on opinion sometimes, or else try to argue with people that Mario is a spinoff and not a main series. Not saying that what you said is factually incorrect, but sometimes it being correct doesn't mean that the majority will embrace it. I think there's a thin line between a game being a spinoff or not.

That's just what happens when Spinoffs become more popular then their predasessors. 

It doesn't change the fact that Mario is still a spinoff... just nobody really even realizes it.

How many people know the Jeffersons are a Spinoff?  How many people know Popeye was a spinoff.

That's just how it works.  Even then, your argueing it from the basis of series.... while he's trying to argue that games that aren't even released yet, and that probably won't have a second game aren't spinoffs.

And, do you actually thing the Final Fantasy Versus line or Final Fantasy zero won't be recognized as final fantasy spinoffs?   With final fantasy in their name.



Kasz216 said:
trestres said:
Kasz216 said:
trestres said:
Kasz216 said:
hikaruchan said:
Acevil said:
 


I think the problem is the perception you have of spin-off, because Jarrod pretty much summed it up.  I think you might hold a biased, since you might views spin-off as a negative, when generally it is a positive.

For example SMT: Persona series is a spin-off series, yet it is widely considered by SMT fans to be one of the best, if not better than mainline SMT or MT. 

Type-0 series is without a doubt a new final fantasy series that spun-off of Final Fantasy name. If it was called just Type-0 it was be a new series all together with final fantasy like elements. 

Versus it might be arguable by some, but it is pretty much a spinoff  game from the Final Fantasy 13 brand. 

I think the some Game series Spin-Offs are not regarded as equal with the Original product. but sub seires I believe can be debatable if they are rally Spin-Offs or not.

Like Persona that is a sub series of SMT so it can be debatable if it is a Spin-Off or not. 

and it can be argued that DMC, Oinmusha and Dino Crisis are just Spin-Offs of Biohazard despite not having the name Biohazard on the cover anywhere.        


No.  It isn't debatable.

At all.

A spinoff is ANYTHING that "spins off" the main franchise.

That's the literal definition of a spinoff.  It has nothing to do with opinion.  It's like argueing that a Penguin isn't a bird because you have your own specialized definition of bird which requires "Must be able to fly."

It's not debatable... your just wrong and working off a fabricated definition.


Not siding with anyone here, but if we are going by straight spin off definitions, then Mario is a Donkey Kong spin off. After all, Mario made his debut in a game called Donkey Kong and since then he has had his own games, but only because it's appearance at the first Donkey Kong game.

Correct?

I guess so, but I've never heard anyone say Mario was a spinoff. That's why I'm saying this. It is based on opinion sometimes, or else try to argue with people that Mario is a spinoff and not a main series. Not saying that what you said is factually incorrect, but sometimes it being correct doesn't mean that the majority will embrace it. I think there's a thin line between a game being a spinoff or not.

That's just what happens when Spinoffs become more popular then their predasessors. 

It doesn't change the fact that Mario is still a spinoff... just nobody really even realizes it.

How many people know the Jeffersons are a Spinoff?  How many people know Popeye was a spinoff.

That's just how it works.  Even then, your argueing it from the basis of series.... while he's trying to argue that games that aren't even released yet, and that probably won't have a second game aren't spinoffs.

And, do you actually thing the Final Fantasy Versus line or Final Fantasy zero won't be recognized as final fantasy spinoffs?   With final fantasy in their name.

I think those are probably going to be recognized as spinoffs, yes. But sometimes a spinoff can grow into a series. Wasn't siding with anyone, just thought I'd add something to the discussion, because it's always been a very controversial topic.



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies