mrstickball said:
As for the guy and the Iranian comments: When you have a countries that brutalizes its people when they want an alternative party, and fixes the elections, I don't think that you live in a free, independent country. Read the news. The elections were falsified. If you want to consider Iran free after what happened during and after their most recent election, then there is no way to have a rational conversation with you.
|
Once again I repeat. When I speak of an independant Iran, I mean of the US orbit. This is the issue with Iran. Not that they are ruled by a theocratic thugish bunch, not the fact that the democracy there is flawed and candidates are vetted as to whether they are Islamic enough, not the fact that it has a poor human rights records. We don't care about that. Hence we support (and have been doing for decades) dictatorships and absolute monarchs in the region with strict barbaric medieval Islamic Law.
No what we hate about Iran is that it is too independant in it's foreign policy. It is a challange to US domination of the region. Iran won't directly challange US domination of the Middle East (far too weak to do that) that's not a problem but problem we do have with it is it won't do as it's told. This is unacceptible if you work on the assumption we rule the world. It wasn't so bad when it was ruled by the dictator Shah before '79 because he was an ally (read subservient) even if his secret police (CIA trained SAVAK) killed and tortured thousands of it's own people. Nope we didn't care about democracy and human rights then in fact we helped overthrow Irans first democractically elected prime minister to help bring about the dictatorship of the brutal Shah regime.
So when the Oval office preaches freedom and democracy for the region or that this or that country is a threat I just know it's all bullshit propaganda.