Nope, that is definately false and your last statement is just stupid.

Actually I disagree with your first statements. Did you ever think price could play a role in this? Also, the fact that you constantly have to keep upgrading, in order to have the best graphics AND the fact that most people are not tech savvy to understand everything you need to, in order to play your games? PC gaming is not dying any time soon, and whoever says that, is dead wrong. Just look at all the true exclusives released on the pc the last few years alone. They far outnumber the 360's or ps3's lol. Console exclusives are games released only on the consoles, and not the pc btw. SC, ME2, Fable 3, and Metro 2033 are not exclusives in any way.

Keyboard and mouse, both superior to gamepad for fpses.

Controllers can be used as well. And with ease, I might add.

20 something inch monitor so close actually is more effective than a big screen TV (depends upon the size though) and sitting on a couch. You can clearly see the jaggies and the low-res, its not so easy on the consoles because you sit back further.

Stereo speakers? You can use any speaker on a PC.

Most people don't have gaming consoles in the first place. But many people have PCs.

The experience is the same because graphics don't contribute much in terms of experience when we are talking things like resolution, and better textures. Sure its great to have them, but ultimately the art is the same and so is the experience, as long as you are playing in a respectable frame-rate. 

Killzone 3's best is not how most people play it, its best is how developers want them to be played. And that is with sharpshooter in 3D, even though it doesn't give an edge in multiplayer, its a different experience compared to DS3. Now most people will obviously not play it that way, since its much more expensive than the just using a DS 3. Does that make it better? No, everything that most people do usually means its cost effective. Its not always a better experience.

Also 30 million steam users is just the steam users. There are other ways of playing games on the PC like retail games, games for windows live.

And it has increased by now.

Consoles aren't any different from a PC. If someone had the $$$, they would hook up their PC to their TV and play it on the couch with a controller. They just use the cheaper option.

Anyway the discussion was move vs kinect games in 2010. I don't see why we shouldn't include launch games like RUSE and resident evil 5 : Move Edition since they were launched or relaunched with move. The normal edition of resident evil 5 doesn't work with move, they actually changed it during their making of gold edition for the move. And resident evil 4 was on the wii, so its obvious resident evil 5 was as good as a title built from ground up for move.

So most people have surround sound on thier PCs?

Most people have a better sound system hooked up to their PCs?

Most people would be happy sitting 2 feet from thier monitor in order to simulate the size of a 48" HDTV at couch distance?

Most people have controllers hooked up to their PCs?

FPSs are all anyone plays so there keyboard and mouse are superior?  What about platformers?  RPGs?  Racing games? 

Most people are just as comfortable in an office chair than on a couch?

Most people can afford gaming PCs?

Please use some common sense. 

If you really think developers focus on PC as much as consoles you're fooling yourself.  You even said yourself piracy is rampant on PC, why would developers focus on that platform?  Why are controls for most games developed around using a controller?  Think about it.

"Killzone 3's best is not how most people play it, its best is how developers want them to be played."

"I don't see why we shouldn't include launch games like RUSE and resident evil 5 : Move Edition"

So was RE5 intended by the developers to be played with Move, or was it tacked on?  According to your first statement the best way to play is the way it was intended.

You can't prove to someone else who has different values that something you like is better than something they like. Give it up people!

What point are you trying to make?   Are you still trying to portay this idea that Kinect has better games for it?   Going by Metacritic,  Move has better, more, quality games for it when compared to Kinect.  Whether the controls are tacked on, or not it doesn't matter.  

There seems to be a lot of misinformation in your post. Also, I'm not sure how your comparison relates in any way to Move and the PS3. The analogy makes no sense.

Oh, and:

http://www.tgdaily.com/games-and-entertainment-features/49818-epic-blames-piracy-for-the-decline-of-pc-gaming

"Epic boss Mike Capps believes rampant software piracy is to blame for the noticeable decline of PC gaming and the rise of the console as a lucrative platform."

So it's your opinion the majority of people prefer to game sitting at their computer?  I disagree.  Unless you're talking about Facebook games.

This is the problem with current stats: None of them track digital downloads where the majority of the market and consumers have moved to. The retail space have gradually reduced the PC space whilst the online and digital space has increased greatly. I'll point you to this indie developer talking about the distribution speficially on Steam vs Retail:

"I remember fondly the meeting in my office with a red-faced publisher who was explaining why their initial order from a major retailer for one of our new releases was just 30 units. At the time I had my browser open on the Steam product data page, which updates sales numbers every few minutes.

“They have taken one unit for each of their top 30 stores” he told me. “There is just no demand from their customers”.

I glanced at my screen, hit refresh and advised him: “In the time it’s taken you to tell me that there is no demand, Steam has sold 45 units”.

http://www.mcvuk.com/features/808/OPINION-Retail-vs-Steam

This is only on Steam. There are many other digital distribution models such as GFWL and GOG as well as publishers own stores (e.g. EA Store, Battlenet). Nowhere tracks the sales online and as Valve are an Ltd. they never need to release their figures (and they never do-so publicly).

Another thing to take into account is whether this is revenue or profit. If its only revenue we know the costs to release a console game are greater than your average PC game (thanks heavily to digital distribution). And I assume it's not taking into account MMO revenue? The majority of monetary transactions, whether they're digital retail games or subscriptions or microtransactions are now done online. 

Also, at the end of the link you posted:

"Most publishers I'm speaking to right now think their money's going to be shifting back to PC and away from traditional consoles, just because folks are in that mode of wanting to spend a little bit of time every now and then, and paying money to save time because there's so much media competing for it."

and

"It's interesting that piracy seems to be doing a lot of 'killing' and yet Valve, still the last bastion of PC gaming, seems to have no problem selling its games, or indeed any of the popular games on Steam," wrote Sterling.

Finally, wtf with the website and those soft porn ads at the bottom?! My girlfriend in in the room :P (she didn't notice though) :D

Try this on for a source of revenue / market share: http://www.newzoo.com/press/NewzooTotalConsumerSpend2010.pdf