Being an Open CL solution, AMD can program it the way they want. The Cell can't do it in any different way than a DX11 Open CL compatible graphics card, it's only a different algorithm. That's all.

Regarding Hypocrisy, it's much more hypocritical to disdain a console and it's control pad to copy it afterwards.

So we agree that people who call move a wii-rip off are hypocritical? I agree that if Sony disdained wii then they are hypocritical as well.
And about the cell, I didn't mean its better than amd, I meant its pretty awesome for a 4 year old processor to do this kind of stuff. 

LOL. it works EXACTLY like the Move does! except that the Move is wireless, and it actually WILL have support from major companies....

Any processor can do it.

To add to this discussion. What I remember reading, and it was also my point of view, was a disdain of the focus on casual game, not the motion technology by itself. "waggle" was often use to illustrate the easy and casual game where you could simply shake the controller to play.

Not as efficiently as the spu's though.

Looks cool, but since it is on PC it will only ever receive niche status.

yeah it is what is used on the xmb.  A magnetometer decides on its orientation and tells you its position relative to the Earth's magnetic field.. it doesn't need the eye to work.  what I was wondering is, is this the same tech. maybe more magnet-o-meters inside.

here is the article about the first controller to use magnetometers:
http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6234451.html

edited: after article was found.