http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Product/The-Biggest-Loser-Ultimate-Workout/66acd000-77fe-1000-9115-d80254510859

adrenalin misfits (kinect)

Right, so you're turning to passively insulting me. Thanks. No, really, very kind of you.

All I asked were some questions because I didn't understand your choices -- and I still don't; they still seem arbitrary and without any significant point -- and I provided some links to games I thought may help. Then, when you explained yourself, I suggested two games be removed from your list (one of which there is a decent counter point to, as listed above). However, you seem to have taken offense to this and turned on me. In particular, this shows you're not even reading what I'm writing to you:

'then I suggest you stop telling me too without actually naming them'

Did you read my post you replied to? I did name them. Both of them, in fact. Don't start making accusations and demands without reading the posts you are referring to first.

Really, chill. Take a deep breath. I have no agenda here. I actually came here to give a hand where I could, and I've had my head bitten off by an oversensitive poster.

In short: I'd rather you didn't project your fears upon me. I'm neither pissed nor concerned about high scores or low scores or whatever else is bothering you. All I was chatting about was what I saw as an odd distinction that you seemed to create all by yourself to make a point I did not understand.

I shouldn't have bothered asking. You clearly have an agenda here, and anything that goes against it, even when it is not aimed as such, will be shouted down.

you would like to focus on games specifically designed with move in mind, i didnt ignore them, though i do question it.  move exclusive games will be far and few between because it will be easy for developers to add move support to games developed for DS3, and likewise, easy for many move developed games to add DS3 support.

it is one of the strengths of moves ability to easy produce a motion controlled lineup of games against kinect, which is why it shouldnt be ignored

kinect will only have sole motion sensor games because it is very limited in the games that can take advantage of it.  move is very unlimited in the games that support can be added to, which will mean that many games will add DS3 support for many move games (or the other way around) because theres no reason not to.  by not adding games that also allow DS3 support, you'll be making one of moves greatest strengths into a weakness (at least as far as your little list is concerned), not because of any technical limitation, but because of your own bias.

what's the point of this? If the Wii is any indicator, scores don't matter for these types of games. Wii Play is a 58 on Meta, and it sold 28M. 

So obviously scores don't matter behind the buying influence of people for these games

I'm perfectly calm and explained myself pretty well the first time, I could have done without your opinion on whether you thought it was a good idea or not, and yes, you come across as condescending if I'm honest. Neither did I bite your head off, you're going a bit OTT.

I have no agender, nor do I need to "shout you down", I explained myself which is more than I had to do, if you don't like it then I'm afraid you'll have to lump it!

It's not about the sales, or I would have added a sales bar.

It has nothing to do with my bias, if Fable 3 still had Kinect support I wouldn't have added that either. Don't come up with your conspiracy theorys to settle your point. You expect this list to be an overall list of games that support Move and Kinect, it isn't, I already explained that and why I've made it this way.

I guess the main problem with adding in games that have recently become 'move enabled' such as Heavy Rain and Resident Evil 5 etc. is that their reviews were based on a different control scheme.  If Metacritic had two scores then there shouldn't be a problem.

I'm just saying. This entire generation, there's been debate about 3rd party, good games not selling, and casual games selling and blah blah blah. 

This gen is different from the past. Metascores don't matter. You can have the largest library in the world, and all the games are below 70, and they still sell millions *ahem*wii*ahem. 

Now, you're only talking about scores, and I understand that. But, for the target audience that Sony and Microsoft are going for, having a 90 game or a sub-50 game doesn't matter, because the "casuals" will buy regardless, hence why I said that comparing scores doesn't matter. 

Unless you're just, in the purest essence, just looking at scores. If I read too much into it, or interpreted too much, then my bad lol.

I just feel that for these games, scores don't matter so there's no point in looking at them