Seece said:
Hapimeses said:
Seece said:
Hapimeses said:
Seece said:
Because this is for SW specifically create with motion in mind, or like I said, part of the move set up. I may have got Eyepet wrong but I thought it was pretty eyetoy focused? If it isn't I'll remove it. This isn't about which library is better, and which has the best SW, because those games absoloutely count, it's about what the main move/kinect games rate.
|
I care nothing for better libraries or similar, I was just interested in your choices. In particular, I don't understand what you mean by 'motion in mind' -- to me, that term applies to both games equally -- that said, yes, EyePet uses the Eye -- but so do many non-Move games.
I don't understand why you'd add EyePet, but not Heavy Rain. Heavy Rain has been rewritten from the ground up to include Move, and it's now completely different, for all it's exactly the same underlying game -- it hasn't just had Move tagged on an as afterthought. If anything, I would say you had EyePet correct, but Heavy Rain wrong, rather than the other way around. There is a reason the game has been repackaged and reissued: it's very different (and it also saves having to download gigs of data at a time for new players!).
But, as I said before, it doesn't really matter. It's just a list after all. But I was intrigued as to your choices.
|
Means they specifically have Move (or the eyetoy, which I take as part of the move set up and rather important to it) as the sole purpose of the game. I don't believe Heavy Rain was this, it was built as a core game, and however well Move has been implemented into it, it has been tacked on, that's not to say it's a bad thing though.
Like I said before, I want to track games specifically made for each set up, where the only focus is the motion control. I added eyepet because of it's eyetoy focus and now being move enabled.
|
Fair enough. It's a nonsense arguement to me -- especially as Heavy Rain uses Move better than EyePet, and certainly more intuatively, and is 100% Move enabled, t'boot -- but whatever suits you. By your odd definition you'd also best remove Hustle Kings and High Velocity Bowling.
I have to say that it kinda defeats the point of listing games that can be played by only using the motion controllers of each platform without the need for additional support from other sources, as you are ignoring games that fit that description, but are excluded for a seemingly odd reason.
|
It's pretty clear cut to me, but then I knew certain people would be pissed due to those high scores not bolstering the line up.
The list is for games that are built from the ground up with the motion controller set up (or eyetoy). It's not difficult to get. I've already said these lists arnt based on overall SW for the controllers or quality of library, I just want to track how the content being specifically made for these controller schemes pans out, there is no need for your incesent whining and condescending tone, and as you may have noticed, I have no idea what most of those move games are, so if you want me to remove the ones you don't think fit in the same vein as heavy rain, then I suggest you stop telling me too without actually naming them. thanks.
|
Right, so you're turning to passively insulting me. Thanks. No, really, very kind of you.
All I asked were some questions because I didn't understand your choices -- and I still don't; they still seem arbitrary and without any significant point -- and I provided some links to games I thought may help. Then, when you explained yourself, I suggested two games be removed from your list (one of which there is a decent counter point to, as listed above). However, you seem to have taken offense to this and turned on me. In particular, this shows you're not even reading what I'm writing to you:
'then I suggest you stop telling me too without actually naming them'
Did you read my post you replied to? I did name them. Both of them, in fact. Don't start making accusations and demands without reading the posts you are referring to first.
Really, chill. Take a deep breath. I have no agenda here. I actually came here to give a hand where I could, and I've had my head bitten off by an oversensitive poster.
In short: I'd rather you didn't project your fears upon me. I'm neither pissed nor concerned about high scores or low scores or whatever else is bothering you. All I was chatting about was what I saw as an odd distinction that you seemed to create all by yourself to make a point I did not understand.
I shouldn't have bothered asking. You clearly have an agenda here, and anything that goes against it, even when it is not aimed as such, will be shouted down.
