Carl2291 said:
twesterm said:
Actually, if I remember correctly, the Wii was pretty famous for it's long draughts. There would be the big Nintendo game and then nothing for a few months yet didn't it sell out for 2-ish straight years? Even those two games you listed didn't come out until more than a year after its release.
|
You guys are completely missing my point.
Nintendo provided new innovative software for the Wii, numerous times. Thus making it keep going so well, for so long.
Kinect needs that. And right now, it's not guaranteed, and I'm not seeing anything new and innovative.
Is it against the rules to say anything slightly negative about Kinect now? It's almost as bad as posting anything negative about the Wii...
|
Overeating a little much aren't you? I wasn't eaxctly jumping down your throat there...
But I am curious, what did Nintendo do that you think was innovative?
They didn't create the minigame, the didn't create the minigame compilation, the Wii didn't invent the platformer, and it didn't invent shooters. What it did do was give us an entirely new way to play games through the remote and accessories like the balance board.
It was that new way to play games and open gaming up to an entirely new audience is where they innovated.
Does the Kinect not do both of those things?
The way I see it, the Wii only really had two legs up on Kinect: the price and the Nintendo brand. Lucky for Microsoft it has that $299 cost which is only $50 more and doesn't actually cross the $300 mark and they have near unlimited advertising funds.