By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo dominates top 10 local multiplayer games!

Barozi said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Barozi said:

Counting only consoles, then probably yes.

Otherwise PC is owning this list


Unless you count LAN as local, that's a dubious assertion at best.

of course I do. There is a good reason why local is part of the LAN acronym


Which is why I asked for that clarification (I found too many fights I got into on boards were from misunderstandings).

But then... what about arcades?



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Around the Network
Mummelmann said:

For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.

No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)

With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).

So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.

However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.

So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

nordlead said:
Mummelmann said:

For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.

No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)

With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).

So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.

However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.

So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).


The thing is, this list is about the games, and not what you have to do to play them locally. And there are many PC games that kick ass when played on LAN.



I LOVE ICELAND!

Joel has only posted the Nintendo Games from the list. Who knows, maybe there are PC-Games if the full list is revealed.



You guys do realise this list is for console only, Craig and Nick said at the beginning that there would be a separate one for PC games.

I think people should actually watch the video first.




Around the Network
KungKras said:
nordlead said:
Mummelmann said:

For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.

No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)

With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).

So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.

However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.

So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).


The thing is, this list is about the games, and not what you have to do to play them locally. And there are many PC games that kick ass when played on LAN.

Yah their are some great PC LAN games, but honestly I don't think they would knock many of Nintendo's titles from the top. As Mummelman says their just aren't that many genres that the PC dominates. FPS, RTS, TBS and what else? A few games come to mind that may have made the list if it inculded PC and I think the list would look alittle different but all in all the PC stopped dominating gaming shortly after the Commador64 and Amiga.



-JC7

"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer

 

Joelcool7 said:
KungKras said:
nordlead said:
Mummelmann said:

For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.

No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)

With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).

So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.

However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.

So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).


The thing is, this list is about the games, and not what you have to do to play them locally. And there are many PC games that kick ass when played on LAN.

Yah their are some great PC LAN games, but honestly I don't think they would knock many of Nintendo's titles from the top. As Mummelman says their just aren't that many genres that the PC dominates. FPS, RTS, TBS and what else? A few games come to mind that may have made the list if it inculded PC and I think the list would look alittle different but all in all the PC stopped dominating gaming shortly after the Commador64 and Amiga.

Pretty much every RTS ever made that support LAN should have made the list. Or at least AoEII, Starcraft, and especially Warcraft 3 would easily have made the list if it had PC games in it. Then we have the Heroes of Might and Magic series with its excellent hot seat multiplayer, and many FPS games that support LAN.
Just becasue there are a few genres doesn't mean that there are plenty of games in those genres that would easily make it.



I LOVE ICELAND!

KungKras said:
Joelcool7 said:
KungKras said:
nordlead said:
Mummelmann said:

For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.

No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)

With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).

So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.

However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.

So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).


The thing is, this list is about the games, and not what you have to do to play them locally. And there are many PC games that kick ass when played on LAN.

Yah their are some great PC LAN games, but honestly I don't think they would knock many of Nintendo's titles from the top. As Mummelman says their just aren't that many genres that the PC dominates. FPS, RTS, TBS and what else? A few games come to mind that may have made the list if it inculded PC and I think the list would look alittle different but all in all the PC stopped dominating gaming shortly after the Commador64 and Amiga.

Pretty much every RTS ever made that support LAN should have made the list. Or at least AoEII, Starcraft, and especially Warcraft 3 would easily have made the list if it had PC games in it. Then we have the Heroes of Might and Magic series with its excellent hot seat multiplayer, and many FPS games that support LAN.
Just becasue there are a few genres doesn't mean that there are plenty of games in those genres that would easily make it.

I think StarCraft would have made the list but I'm not sure about AoEII which is one of my all time favorite games and WarCraft wasn't as big as StarCraft. This is the top ten not top 20. Their are plenty of great FPS and RTS on PC but I don't think they would all have what it takes to secure a good position in the top ten.



-JC7

"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer

 

Joelcool7 said:
KungKras said:
Joelcool7 said:
KungKras said:
nordlead said:
Mummelmann said:

For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.

No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)

With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).

So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.

However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.

So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).


The thing is, this list is about the games, and not what you have to do to play them locally. And there are many PC games that kick ass when played on LAN.

Yah their are some great PC LAN games, but honestly I don't think they would knock many of Nintendo's titles from the top. As Mummelman says their just aren't that many genres that the PC dominates. FPS, RTS, TBS and what else? A few games come to mind that may have made the list if it inculded PC and I think the list would look alittle different but all in all the PC stopped dominating gaming shortly after the Commador64 and Amiga.

Pretty much every RTS ever made that support LAN should have made the list. Or at least AoEII, Starcraft, and especially Warcraft 3 would easily have made the list if it had PC games in it. Then we have the Heroes of Might and Magic series with its excellent hot seat multiplayer, and many FPS games that support LAN.
Just becasue there are a few genres doesn't mean that there are plenty of games in those genres that would easily make it.

I think StarCraft would have made the list but I'm not sure about AoEII which is one of my all time favorite games and WarCraft wasn't as big as StarCraft. This is the top ten not top 20. Their are plenty of great FPS and RTS on PC but I don't think they would all have what it takes to secure a good position in the top ten.

The diplomany in AoE make it an incredible LAN experience when many people play it. There are alliances on the rise and backstabbing everywhere.

And there are so many great custom maps to play on WC3 like the creature, or Mafia Wars.

Trust me, those games would have easily made it to the top 10.



I LOVE ICELAND!

Don't forget all the geat RPG's you can play on LAN on PC!