Mummelmann said:
For consoles? I would say so. All in all with PC counted; hell no, and even the most stoic Nintendo fan has to agree on that.
|
No, I don't have to agree. For starters, PC multiplayer tends to be centered around FPS & strategy games (real time or turn-based) and I can't say I know much else that gets played LAN. There are probably some sports, but they are the same sports titles that are on consoles that support 10-player games (at least back when we had multitaps)
With Nintendo you get some games that you can't find anything like on PC (or that match the quality if they are found on the PC). For example, just looking at first party games, titles that play like Mario Party, Smash, Mario Kart, Wii Sports and NSMBWii can't be found on the PC (or pale in comparison).
So, depending on the type of local multiplayer you want, it is easy enough to argue for either side.
However, LAN has one major drawbacks to console multiplayer. The need for everyone to carry their PC, Monitor, Keyboard, and Mouse all over to the event. Then you either need a large area room for everyone to sit on the floor, or a ton of table space. This is a major drawback for many people and I've only ever had a game size of 4 or 5 at the largest.
So, I would easily say that Nintendo destroys PC for local multiplayer (in the 2-4 player range) due to ease of use and the variety of games that I can play that I can't on PC. But I would agree that PC has pretty much every system beat for online multiplayer and for games supporting 5 or more players (not a lot of console games supported more than 4 players).