No, you're wrong, and a lot of other people in this thread have already tried to sensibly explain to you why that is. I'm not going to bother anymore if you just don't want to see logic. If you honestly do not understand a console needs as broad a library as possible, instead of limiting itself to a specific type of game you're beyond help.

In your world, 360 would have just Halo and GTA, and PS3 just GTA and, well, GT5, maybe. Nothing else, 'cos that wouldn't sell consoles.

Once again, you're hilarious. XD

Yes, I get that. But he literally called such titles (including Galaxy, which happens to be a near-10-million-seller, how many games can claim that?) 'wastes'.

Also, he's claiming SS is a waste, a title we know hardly anything about and which may not release for another year. How awkward is that, especially considering TP, its predecessor, is one of the best-selling Zelda games ever, and was without a shred of doubt a system seller when Wii launched. And you and I both know there are a LOT of people clamouring for a new console Zelda, let alone a 1:1 motion controlled one.

So, in conclusion, those things do indeed make him wrong. And very much so.

Wrong, they are wastes, wastes are uses of resources that don;t add any value, thanks for proving my point that you have no understanding of the business.

If the games didn;t push hardware, then they didn;t add value, because consumers didn;t consider them a reason to buy the system, hence they are wastes

Skyward sword will not push console sales at all, so once again I will be right, and you wrong, just wait and see.

I find it funny people keep saying that I'm wrong, but no one has given me a reason why, except they like the games, but the fact is, they would have bought the system even without those games, so that argument is flawed

LOL...this is funny cuz no matter what happens none of the HD systems will ever catch up to the Wii!!!  By the time they even come close it's already time to release a new system.  Mark my words 2012 or bust all console makers will release or be close to releasing a new system.   Maybe 2014, for Sony as the PS3 has left a nasty gash on them that will take some IF EVER to heal!!! (PS3 is the BIGGEST FAILURE THIS GENERATION the real winners are Nintendo and Microsoft)

No you're still wrong, a console maker doesn't need to have a wide library, they can focus on games that sell hardware, third parties exist for a reason let them focus on the games that don;t push hardware, I'm afraid you have no understanding of the VG business, and the fact is, your plan has been shown as flawed and a failure, resltng in wastes of resources and lost momentum

axt113 said:

No you're still wrong, a console maker doesn't need to have a wide library, they can focus on games that sell hardware, third parties exist for a reason let them focus on the games that don;t push hardware, I'm afraid you have no understanding of the VG business, and the fact is, your plan has been shown as flawed and a failure, resltng in wastes of resources and lost momentum

Wrong, they are wastes, wastes are uses of resources that don;t add any value, thanks for proving my point that you have no understanding of the business.

If the games didn;t push hardware, then they didn;t add value, because consumers didn;t consider them a reason to buy the system, hence they are wastes

Skyward sword will not push console sales at all, so once again I will be right, and you wrong, just wait and see.

I find it funny people keep saying that I'm wrong, but no one has given me a reason why, except they like the games, but the fact is, they would have bought the system even without those games, so that argument is flawed