axt113 said:
Cheebee said:
axt113 said:
Cheebee said:
axt113 said:
theRepublic said:
axt113 said:
Galaxy 2 sold less than Galaxy one, was not a system seller and sold far, far less than NSMB, that's a flop
|
Really? So Nintendo should do nothing to maintain diversity in its library or cater to massive niches within its fanbase? Sounds like a great business strategy you got there.
|
Massive Niches, lol, what massive niche was activated by Galaxy? NSMB Wii got that Niche and more.
Face i, games like Galaxy, Other M and Skyward are wastes , so yeah, my business strategy would have not only resulted in more sales, but would have kept momentum going
|
You're hilarious. XD
|
No I'm right, just look at the sales, and hardware pushing ability of the games
|
No, you're wrong, and a lot of other people in this thread have already tried to sensibly explain to you why that is. I'm not going to bother anymore if you just don't want to see logic. If you honestly do not understand a console needs as broad a library as possible, instead of limiting itself to a specific type of game you're beyond help.
In your world, 360 would have just Halo and GTA, and PS3 just GTA and, well, GT5, maybe. Nothing else, 'cos that wouldn't sell consoles.
Once again, you're hilarious. XD
|
No you're still wrong, a console maker doesn't need to have a wide library, they can focus on games that sell hardware, third parties exist for a reason let them focus on the games that don;t push hardware, I'm afraid you have no understanding of the VG business, and the fact is, your plan has been shown as flawed and a failure, resltng in wastes of resources and lost momentum
|
