Yah except the problem is people say such ridiculous stuff all the time and mean every word of it. I couldn't even begin to count my own fanboyism's let alone other peoples. 

On topic PS3 is and should be the lead console for every project then again PS3 should only get AA and AAA games and everything they get should be exclusive but hey thats asking to much.

Agree. Like many have said on here and in many other places, it's easier to port from PS3 --> 360. But in order to do that, you must make you game run smoothly on the PS3 first, before your finished product can go to the 360. If you do it inversely, you can get it to run fine on the 360, but then run like shit on the PS3. 

Contradictory to what patapon says, with 360 ---> PS3, THAT'S lazy, because it never comes out good. But with PS3 --> 360, developers take on the challenge, produce a quality product, THEN port to 360 which is an easier task. You could say lead on 360, then port to PS3 and that will present a challenge, and that won't mock Sony's moniker with the PS3. But remember, release dates are based on development cycles. I'd be much happier if the dev told me a game is releasing on a certain date (due to PS3 development) and that's the date I set, rather than them having to possibility of releasing an earlier 360 version, thus getting my hopes up for release. Only to be disappointed when the difficult PS3 port holds the game up

Well EA doing it now and there statement for why "if it runs well on the PS3, it runs well anywhere"

Uhhh... I'm okay with PS3 ports having the problems.

If they focus on the PS3, they might half ass on the 360. That wouldn't be acceptable.

Err, you obviously don't understand the reasoning behind the switch to the PS3 as the lead platform.

The 360 coding is rather simple and straight forward. The PS3 is not. So when you develop on the 360, you end up with your coded game that ends up as a shoddy PS3 port because they didn't put in the extra work to code it correctly through the PS3's more difficult algorithms. 

When you code on the PS3 first, you make sure all of the hard stuff is done, so when you port it over to the 360, minimal work needs to be done for it to be a quality port.

If you're going to make a multi-platform game for PS3 then 360 the best approach is to either lead on PS3 and port to 360 or to develop at the same time for each with no porting at all - so I guess I agree as the other choices are the inferior route to take.

I think it's a great decision to go with. It's easier to port PS3 to X360 than the other way around.

Considering how Ubisoft is doing this for most of their games other than their Shooters is a great approach along with EA and other devs.

But I also like the 'no port' approach where the PS3, X360 and PC versions of the same game are developed separately so no game becomes a port aka Crysis 2 and RAGE.

definitly!

look @ vanquish,castle vania,dead space 2,darksiders,batman AA etc.

it performs like magic when ps3 is lead platform.

what you say work both ways dude if the devloper does 360 as lead and ports it over to the ps3 all is needed is a little extra work with the code its not as complex as people make it most developers have figured it out. To me it depends on the devloper and how they want to work it. Personally i would start from the 360 most of the time.