Before I sold my 360 last week I have checked what was available on XBLA and to me it didn't offer what the SONY party offerings did.

If you choose to accept that or not means nothing to me.

Point is that they are comparing PS3 vs 360 and they used XB1 games to even the score while ignoring PS1 games. Go on and act like that doesn't matter, I could care less.

They flat out say "XBox 360 offers backwards compatiblity with XBOX1 titles" while forgetting to mention that PS3 has access to hundred or even thousands of PS1 titles, which IMO surpass any offering on XB1 titles considering how MS dropped XBL support for those titles. They talk as if PS3 has zero backwards compatibility.

So in their eyes for PS3 games to surpass XB360 it needs to have PS2 B/C, even though they outright admit that PS3 library surpasses XB360 library? -__-

Did you watch the video and listen to what they said?

Yawn, video put up to collect clicks, I'll exercise my right not to in this instance I think.

well, now that MS and Sony are really sticking to their 10-year plan or whatever, the storage capacity advantage of blu-ray becomes even more relevant. Besides who said it doesn't have value? I've playing games on my PS3 that just wouldn't be possible or the same on 1 DVD or multiple discs. Metal Gear Solid 4, Uncharted 2, God of War 3, the list goes on and everybody not an ignorant knows this. I will be enjoying my Gran Turismo 5 in one blu-ray thank you very much. Oh, and even "lesser" multiplat games enjoy much superior less compressed and TRULY HD CG VIDEOS on the PS3 versions. Like Dante's Inferno, Final Fantasy XIII, Darksiders, that list is quite long, and I do appreciate video quality on my 70" screen not those pixelated-compressed 360 videos yuck....I guess you can't appreciate value on a crappy screen playing crappy games, but I'm nobody to judge....

Design - I agree that 360 looks cooler, but 360 should have lots a couple more points for still having the power brick. PS3 shouldn't have lots by THAT much just for having a boring matte finish.

Features - Agreed, but they failed to mention there's a 320GB PS3 out as well as just 160GB.

Online - 360 deserves to win this category no doubt, but PS3 should have been a bit higher than a 3.3, more like a 3.7 or 3.8, all its really missing is cross game chat and a few other small things. Also I'm pretty sure you don't need a disk for netflix anymore on PS3. I would mention its free but that's more to do with the value section.

Games - I don't really get how this was a tie. 360 has some exclusives as well as slightly better versions of multiplat games (not so much anymore) but PS3 rocks them in exclusives. I would have given PS3 a 4.5 and 360 the 4 it got.

Graphics - No argument here, a slight edge to PS3 sounds about right.

Value - No argument here, but I think it should have been a bit more in PS3's favour since you get free online compared to $60 per year. By not having to pay that $60 for online you could buy an extra game each year.

Overall not too bad a comparison, but maybe a bit 360 biased (even though the PS3 won by a hair). But the truth is who gives a shit about a slight graphical edge or design or whatever. The three that really matter for gamers are games, online service and value; and games comes down to personal preference. PS3 and 360 both have great graphics,  lots of features and good enough designs so those are really irrelevant unless your a fanboy trying to prove your console is better.

That's true, but I think the Slim 360 has pretty much fixed the RRoD problem the old model had so I think it would just be a tie or whatever.

lmao yeah I can vouch for this sort of thing. My fuckin dog stepped on my 360 a while ago, it didn't break it but it scratched the fuck out of my GTA4 disk.

Not a bad video. Only one score I disagree strongly with and that's in the graphics department.

Was kinda lolz worthy that 2 guys scored the graphics on the ps3 and 360 equally. But I suppose it's opinion based ultimately.

Mulitplats generally are as good or better on 360, a handful of PS3 exclusives look better than anything on the 360.  When you weigh up the difference be thankful they gave the PS3 the same score as the vast majority of titles look as good or better on the 360.

Seeing as there better games graphics wise on the pc and they require no blu ray, I tend to not give it credit for graphics. They could achieve the same results by using multiple discs with installs, since all ps3's have a harddrive.

exactly my point of view. As the 2D defense force leader, I will not pick up a 3D TV anytime soon. Without glasses, sure I am coll with it, but not with glasses.

And I get all my movies from XBL in the first place