Shonen said:
Icyedge said:
Shonen said:
NiKKoM said:
Portable 3D porn! ...wait.. this isn't a suggestion thread... *leaves thread*
|
This.
Also guys we all must know, that 3DS's 3D is way less intrusive to the eyes than a pair of 3D glasses from the theaters.
|
Nintendo 3DS is neat, im gonna get one first day, but thats no reason to downplay the other tech. LCD shutter glasses as seen in Nvidia 3D vision and PS3 works flawlessly, is not intrusive to the eyes and is more impressive than a glassless parallax barrier screen... Im wondering on what your are basing your statement of glassless 3D being less intrusive. For example, you could have said it was less hassle. But nothing prove that it is less intrusive, on the contrary, since LCD shutter glasses is already not intrusive to the eyes. Beware that in regular cinema its called polarise glasses, which is not the same technology and cause some ghosting.
|
Did u played the 3DS ?
|
I tried the same tech but not the 3DS itself. I do know very well how different 3D tech works. I already had 3D at home 7 years ago both, and I really really like all kinds of 3D. On my part I dont have any problem with any kind of 3D, that includes parallax barrier screen. But, LCD shutter glasses is more comfortable, more precise, whatever your viewing angle or distance from screen it is always working flawlessly. Parallax barrier screen is bound to cause more problem than LCD shutter glasses even tough it is glassless. To see 3D each eye should receive a different image right? Glasses can control that at 100%. Parallax barrier screen, depending on your adjustment (slider), will emit 2 light signal (image) at 2 different angle, so each eye get his own, which creates the 3D. If you move frontward or backward or change your viewing angle your messing that up. This obviously will cause more problem to sensitive person.
Glassless is neat, but not a better way of seeing 3D with the current mass market tech, that is my point. Its not about 3DS suck or PS3 3D suck, its about parallax barrier screen 3D being less effective and precise than LCD shutter glasses 3D. Both are cool, they dont suck, I wouldnt want to use a handheld carrying a pair of strange sunglasses with me on the street.
About 3D glasses and regular glasses. I think its people that dont wear regular glasses that thinks its a problem to wear both. Actually, I remember when I was a teen and had to wear glasses, it took me a couple of days to develop the habit and be use to it. Wearing 3D glasses is as natural as wearing my regular glasses. Because of that It even should be less of a problem to person that already wear glasses. Wearing both is a non issue, it doesnt change anything.
Conclusion, I easily understand why people prefer glassless 3D, I would easily prefer it too if it would give the same results. But, by any mean, im glad 3DS will not use glasses as it would really be a problem for a handheld.
